Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
rex
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Location: stuart fla
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 119
|
Topic: air tabs Posted: 01 Sep 2013 at 8:45pm |
|
jrr
|
 |
rex
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Location: stuart fla
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 119
|
Posted: 01 Sep 2013 at 8:53pm |
I hope all can see them botton of picture is a slide not to good at adding pictures, Just got back from a trip, lots of rain you can see back is not to dirty,tabs help that, will let all know about fuel savings when my son get all the numbers.
|
jrr
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 01 Sep 2013 at 9:48pm |
I'll be interested in seeing the long-term results. :-)
|
|
 |
Paige
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 23 Jul 2012
Location: Upstate NY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 216
|
Posted: 01 Sep 2013 at 9:51pm |
Me too!
|
Paige and Pete
2010 177 - RPug
2012 Rav (six cylinder)
New York & Florida residents
|
 |
rex
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Location: stuart fla
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 119
|
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 9:35pm |
Air tabs been using them for several months have not been a long trip until past week went on a 550mile round trip,and averaged .4 miles per gal increase,on a long haul say 1000 miles or more its a little savings, the tabs almost stop the pushing effect or sway when being passed by bigger truck,rear of trailor stays cleaner you can see the swirl behind you when pulling in the rain,I USED a total of 32 tabs,16 ea side bought 5 extra,just in case total cost $114.42,w freight.Ea tab costs $2.75. HOPE this is helpful and you can understand me. thanks
|
jrr
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 03 Sep 2013 at 1:12pm |
If I had time to kill I would try to rig up a "tail" like this guy did for his car, to see if that smoothed out the rear airflow enough to help with mpg. This guy achieved a 15% increase.
Alternatively I would like to rig up a triangle that would essentially convert the rear of the pod to a standard camper's boxy rear, to see how that changed things. In either case the pod's hitch could be used to support the weight, along with two straps over the top running to the tongue to pull it tight and provide more support.
|
|
 |
Seanl
Senior Member
Joined: 19 Sep 2011
Location: Fredericton NB
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 633
|
Posted: 03 Sep 2013 at 2:53pm |
I think although I have never tested it in any way that a lot of the issues with drag on the Rpod is the distance between the TV and the RPod nose. The rounded nose of the pod would create a space between the TV and Pod that would create turbulence that would increase drag. I know that in Tractor Trailers they put fairings on the tractor to reduce the gap between the tractor and the trailer to get more laminar flow across the whole rig. I have thought that maybe the tabs on the back of the TV or both might work better.
|
Sean, 2011 Rpod RP-173,2009 Jeep Liberty Rocky Mountain Edition
|
 |
Sleepless
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2013
Location: Titusville, FL
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 556
|
Posted: 03 Sep 2013 at 3:13pm |
To me, much of the R-Pod's design problem is the backward slope of the lower part of the front. Bring the front down perpendicular to the road and I bet mpg will improve. Again, this is just me thinking out loud.
Bob
|
2014 R-Pod 178 (OUR POD)
2009 Chevrolet Avalanche
|
 |
dsmiths
Senior Member
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Location: Southern Ind
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 866
|
Posted: 03 Sep 2013 at 10:36pm |
The tabs look similar to vortex generators on some aircraft, these generate turbulence and break up the flow of air for specific purposes. I don't see how disturbing the air flow at the back of the pod could help induced drag. I agree with many that the problem is the shape of the front of the pod and the distance between the T.V. and the front of the pod, this area is subject to a vacuum and turbulence and increases induced drag. I don't care, its still fun and cool looking.
|
Dane and Donna Smith
2011 RP-172
2008 Chevrolet Trailblazer 4X4
lift kit
prodigy wireless brake controller
|
 |
Outbound
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 767
|
Posted: 05 Sep 2013 at 1:26pm |
I did road tests and computer simulations on airflow over my vehicle and r-pod several years ago. The gap between the vehicle and the front of the r-pod really didn't create significant drag. The problem area was created directly behind the r-pod: fast moving air travelled along the roof slammed down to the ground immediately behind the trailer and created a large swirling vortex of low pressure about 5' high behind the trailer.
Next time you're pulling the trailer in the rain/drizzle, watch around the rear of the trailer in your mirrors - you can see the maelstrom that's created back there.
In reality, the r-pod's shape creates far from a sleek slipstream. I think that Doug's approach for a squared-off rear (or maybe something more rounded-off and airstream-ish) would likely perform much better.
Question for rex: Have you tried the air tabs across the top of your trailer? I suspect that installing them along the rear edge of the air conditioner (and extending that line across the top of the trailer) would yield the best results.
|
Craig :: 2009 RP171 towed by a 2017 F150
|
 |