![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Author | |
WashStateNana ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 26 Aug 2015 Location: SE Washington Online Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
![]() Posted: 30 Aug 2015 at 10:49am |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Don Halas ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 01 Jul 2015 Location: Connecticut Online Status: Offline Posts: 190 |
![]() |
We bought the R-Pod early July with the expectations of towing it with a Mazda-CX9 rated for 3,500 lbs.
Just picked up my new F-150 yesterday... See my post at http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6622&PN=5&title=new-rp178-owner for more information. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() |
No, thank you! I can now put away my jug of Maalox...until the question comes up again. ![]() I think I hold the record for towing an Rpod with the most wimpy tow vehicle. Back in 2008, I bought a new CMC Canyon (185hp 4 cyl.) and was towing a Coleman Taos popup (@995lbs.) Life was good. Then I decided to buy my Rpod (the following year)and make my trip to the Rocky Mts. that I had always dreamed of. Well, I made it (Devine intervention?) and have the pictures to prove it: Rocky Mts. While I could go on at length, let's just say the drive there and back (from central Indiana) was less than 100% enjoyable. You did well in not choosing "wimpy". Congratulations on your new vehicle! Good luck and good/safe travels. |
|
![]() |
|
WashStateNana ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 26 Aug 2015 Location: SE Washington Online Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
![]() |
After much deliberation and mind-changing, we purchased the 2010 Yukon. The price sounds high, but the price was right in line with several similar age/mileage local vehicles. The dealer came down a couple thousand, so we feel like we got a fair deal.....and we love the extras.
After we recover from the big cash drain, we'll be ready to drive the TV to dealers and private parties to find the second half of the team. Thanks, everyone, for your helpful comments! Without you, we would have bought wimpy instead of powerful
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
techntrek ![]() Admin Group - pHp ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Location: MD Online Status: Offline Posts: 9062 |
![]() |
Yukon is the same as the Tahoe, which is the little brother of the Suburban/Yukon XL. Both models are excellent tow vehicles, with body-on-frame construction, rear wheel drive, and enough hp and torque. The Suburban/XL has a higher tow capacity because of the longer wheel base. Longer wheel base gives you more stability. When I was looking around the Subs and Tahoes with the same age/mileage were nearly the same price so I went with the longer wheel base. The 5.3 engine and 6 engine both have good hp and torque curves. If towing power is more important than mpg to you, look for one with the 6 liter engine.
Seems like a steep markup. I paid around $29k for our 2010 Suburban 3 years ago, which had 27k miles at the time. It was in excellent shape and had multiple options, although not all of the same ones you listed. You pay more for the GMC badge and leather seats but that still is a lot more IMO. I would check out the pricing of Subs and Tahoes of the same age/mileage for comparison. Something to know about - the valve lifters on the 2007-2011 engines have a problem, enough that Chevy issued a Tech Service Bulletin on it and they cover replacement under the powertrain warranty. Mine developed it over the last 6 months and I'm now negotiating with them over having it done (I took it in for diagnosis 3 weeks after my warranty expired!).
|
|
![]() |
|
WashStateNana ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 26 Aug 2015 Location: SE Washington Online Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
![]() |
Tonight we took a beautiful rig for a test drive - 2010 Yukon, one owner, 71k miles. It has lots of goodies - leather interior, backup camera, heavy duty tow package, power liftgate, remote start, clean and looks like new. The dealer has it listed at 31k which seems in the ballpark for its age and condition. We were hoping to not spend that much for a TV, but this sure is tempting.
Opinions on Yukon - thumbs up or down?
|
|
![]() |
|
techntrek ![]() Admin Group - pHp ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Location: MD Online Status: Offline Posts: 9062 |
![]() |
This was my solution too. Used the utility trailer with my minivans before the SUV. Many times I've had a full load of people plus the trailer full of kayaks. Can't do that with a pickup.
|
|
![]() |
|
Gavin ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 2015 Location: South Carolina Online Status: Offline Posts: 23 |
![]() |
Hi OP
We have the Rpod 176t, its a little smaller than the 179 but heres my experiences thus far: I have a ranger 3.0 and would not even think about it except on maybe very flat land and just a short hop for few miles maybe 20 or so.,,if you have the higher rated 4.0 ranger with a better towing capacity then you might be ok....but just that...ok The DW has a Ford Edge crossover rated at 3500 tow capacity and I have seen a Cheyenne camping center video on youtube towing a rpod just fine with a ford edge crossover but its on Iowa country flatlands. With all that said, I went up I-26 into the mountains of NC from SC; up the Saluda grade and onwards to I-40...there were some decent hills along the way and I could really feel it pulling on a F-150 I have...it has the tow package and a 5.4 liter/330 cu inch engine...it often would downshift to get the power it needed from the automatic transmission. I was surprised as to how much I could feel the trailer back there...on flatland it did pretty good and was not often "felt". My observation told me a crossover V-6 something or other around 3.5 or better would be ok in flat country but I feel a transmission would be repaired or replaced within a year or so if you did a lot of hill country with it. Will I be using the DW's Ford Edge to tow with it? Heck no, after what I felt in the hill country towing with the f-150 I don't even want to think about how much a transmission rebuild would cost! IM also short and I do a bulk of my driving in a Toyota corolla and leave the F-150 in the driveway about 99% of the time. The ranger is something hard to part with...Ive had it since 95 and the original owner...they are about the toughest truck Ive ever had but they are too small( other than the extended cab 4.0 ... maybe?)for the rpod. If I didn't tow with the f-150 my next choice would have been to get and Expedition All the best! Gavin |
|
![]() |
|
ToolmanJohn ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Apr 2014 Location: Connecticut Online Status: Offline Posts: 451 |
![]() |
I bought my first SUV after owning my home for several years. All I had ever owned were small economy cars, or mid-sized sedans. I never had the slightest interest in owning a pickup truck, as I had no need for a truck.
I started having to tow a small trailer loaded with 1 ton of pellet fuel to my house 3 times each Fall. The 1998 Olds Intrigue sedan didn't like the extreme hill I live on when towing. And, occasionally, a Winter snow would prevent me from getting home in the evening. I would have to wait until the plow trucks sanded... Which sometimes took several hours of waiting. So I wanted 4wd or AWD, and some reasonable tow capacity, and that's how I ended up with a 2003 4Runner. Great reliable vehicle, had it for 10 years... Then I towed the 2013 R-Pod ... The 4Runner is barely adequate as a tow vehicle at highway speeds (55-65mph). Still not a P/U truck fan, so I ended up with a diesel SUV, and so far, it's been a perfect commuter vehicle, and an excellent tow vehicle. I won't be looking for a new vehicle for at least 6-7 more years. Should be some really nice hybrid diesel/electric powertrains by then.
|
|
2017 ATC 7X20 Custom Toy Hauler
2013 R-Pod 177 (SOLD) 2013 VW Touareg TDI |
|
![]() |
|
furpod ![]() Moderator Group - pHp ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 Jul 2011 Location: Central KY Online Status: Offline Posts: 6128 |
![]() |
I agree with the SUV. At first giving up my PU hurt.. then I bought a utility trailer that will carry more weight, is easier to load and unload, and will carry stuff like my big riding mower to the shop if needed. Much better combo.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |