![]() |
P-pod for dry camping? |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 16> |
| Author | |
gpokluda
Senior Member
Joined: 11 Nov 2018 Location: East Idaho Online Status: Online Posts: 510 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: P-pod for dry camping?Posted: 03 Apr 2022 at 1:22pm |
|
Apologies. Just getting used to the site. I'll make sure not be disruptive next time
|
|
|
Gpokluda
2017 Rpod 179(sold 2023) 2022 Escape 5.0TA 2022 Ford F150 4X4 3.5EB Honda SCL500 |
|
![]() |
|
MarkW
Groupie
Joined: 25 Jan 2021 Location: Michigan Online Status: Offline Posts: 56 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Apr 2022 at 9:36am |
|
The challenge will be to resist the temptation to carry the few extra things that could push you over the limit and to be prepared to see signs of wear and tear on your drive train.
Our tow vehicle helps with that temptation. In particular, it helps with being able to tell my wife why we need to keep things light and can't fill the tanks. Which I don't want to do anyway (I don't want to stay in campgrounds with hookups and dump stations, worry about freezing when temps drop at night in the desert, or even listen to the loud water pump). She now (on her own) has made a list of things she didn't use and doesn't need on the next trip (and wants to know how soon we can go). She's quite OK with the insect sprayer shower. Our trailer felt very luxurious compared to, for example, the Canadian couple with a rooftop tent on their Highlander who were making do with sponge baths ;) As for the drivetrain, towing adds wear and tear regardless. But when Subaru came out with the Outback XT models like ours, they dropped in the drivetrain from the larger, heavier 3-row Ascent that has a 5000# rating, so it should be up to the task. But we'll see.
|
|
![]() |
|
MarkW
Groupie
Joined: 25 Jan 2021 Location: Michigan Online Status: Offline Posts: 56 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Apr 2022 at 9:19am |
|
Beyond that there are cases of rpods (and many other trailer models) developing sway with tongue weight at or below 10% of trailer weight so you should stay above that under all loading conditions. Yes, I agree that trailer sway is really the biggest safety concern. But a larger vehicle doesn't seem to help much in that (looking at all the dashcam trailer crash videos, you can see it doesn't take a very large trailer to roll a pickup when the trailer goes sideways). A larger TV only really helps to the extent that it makes it easier to increase tongue weight without exceeding max tongue weight. ...most here want at least 10-20% above that to improve vehicle control under extreme/emergency conditions But, AFAIK, you don't have any data at all to show what the effects of a 10%, or 20% or 50% margin with respect to tow ratings has. Does it actually improve safety in extreme conditions? And how much? You simply don't know. It's just a guess. I'm not blaming you for not having such data. I don't think anybody really has it (there are so many possible combinations of TV and trailer and even for a given combination, things will vary based on the hitch setup, loading of the vehicles, tires, weather conditions, speeds, etc). As for the validity of using a 4000 mile trip as an assesent of safety, it is important to understand the statistics of low probability events and how safety incidents occur. It is true, though, that driving is very safe (even while towing -- though obviously less so). It's the reason why safety problems with autonomous vehicles took so long to emerge. So, no, a single 4400 mile trip can't tell us about safety at a level of a handful of crashes per million miles driven. But it can rule out the idea that the configuration just doesn't work (e.g. that it simply can't handle mountains or wind or rough roads or will break down and overheat, etc). but might if those two events were combined with a slick road surface or a significant crosswind, or both. Is my stopping distance while towing longer or shorter than it would be if I were driving the larger Subaru Ascent vs our Subaru Outback? The trailer brakes provide the stopping power for the weight of the trailer in both cases (and the vehicle brakes for the vehicles). And have you heard of the Peltzman Effect? This suggests that people with heavier tow vehicles may be more likely to load the trailer more heavily (but the trailer brake rotors don't get bigger), drive faster, drive in more adverse conditions, etc. What I do object to is encouraging others, who might be new to trailer towing and may not yet have the skills needed to weigh or operate their rigs safely, to take such unnecessary risks. What I object to is confidently telling people that they should allow a 10% or 20% margin, when you don't have any data backing that up. You may be discouraging people from getting into RVing at all by telling them they have to go out and buy big new TV before they even get started. But in the end, both of us are just guys commenting on the Internet -- nobody should take our opinions as any kind of gospel. My safety advice for towing would be less about the TV (other than staying within specs). First, I agree that getting the tongue weight high enough to minimize sway is critical. After that, it would about behavior. Drive slow -- especially until you gain more experience. And avoid driving in bad weather (there's an old saying from flying something like "90% of those killed in IFR conditions are buried on VFR days"). If you have to wait somewhere for an extra day or two until a storm blows over, do it (as we chose to do in the Wichita Mountains on this trip -- we were really ready to move on, but the predicted winds were crazy high, so we hunkered down). |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain
Senior Member
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Apr 2022 at 6:19am |
|
MarkW, I'm glad you had a wonderful trip and had no serious issues with your trailer or TV. As long as you keep the weight down below the maximum capacity both in towing weight and combined gross vehicle weight, especially with the awareness of being close to the limit as you drive, you'll probably be fine. The challenge will be to resist the temptation to carry the few extra things that could push you over the limit and to be prepared to see signs of wear and tear on your drive train.
I was advised, when I decided to sell our 172 and was looking for a trailer with a little more room, that the slightly wider [6"], higher [another 6"], and heavier [about 500# gvw], and longer [3'] Sonoma 167rb would result in much poor fuel economy, much more problematic to drive. Though I was much closer to the maximum combined vehicle weight, I was still within the limits. I had no issues towing the new trailer and the fuel consumption was exactly the same as it was when I pulled our Pod. In fact, the under chassis wheel configuration, instead of the cantilevered axle of the rPod, made towing easier because I needed a foot less side to side clearance for the trailer. So much for the advice I got. So, enjoy your trailer and travels. And, as they say in the Boy Scouts, be prepared.
|
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Apr 2022 at 5:37am |
|
If you are (by actual weighing, not estimates based on empty weight specs) within all your vehicles' limitations (all 3 axles, tow vehicle max, trailer max, combined vehicle max, tongue max), and you otherwise meet the towing requirements of your vehicle (eg
frontal area) then you are legal. Beyond that there are cases of rpods (and many other trailer models) developing sway with tongue weight at or below 10% of trailer weight so you should stay above that under all loading conditions. Towing safety factors beyond these are up to the operator, most here want at least 10-20% above that to improve vehicle control under extreme/emergency conditions. Some want much more than that based in their personal experience and risk tolerance. As for the validity of using a 4000 mile trip as an assesent of safety, it is important to understand the statistics of low probability events and how safety incidents occur. Nearly all incidents involve multiple coincident factors. Several things have to go wrong at once, otherwise such incidents would be much more common. For example, a wreck might not occurs because of a marginal tow vehicle combined with an idiot pulling out in front, but might if those two events were combined with a slick road surface or a significant crosswind, or both. When safety experts evaluate these incidents they generally see a combination of several of these adverse factors with one or more unsafe behaviors by the operator. These unsafe behaviors are reinforced if nothing bad happens and become the operator's norm. That's just human nature and it's difficult to counteract. That's why modern safety traing focusses on identifying and enhancing the operator's awareness of his behavior, rather than just training against a list of rules. In this case the behavior is travelling with a borderline rig, and it's reinforced by thousands of miles without incident, until ultimately a combination of adverse factors can combine to result in an accident. Remember that serious accidents are thankfully very rare events and take millions of miles of travel to obtain good statistics for. In any case, if youre legal, additional safety factors are up to you and I have no objection, we are all free within our legal limits to operate our vehicles as we wish. What I do object to is encouraging others, who might be new to trailer towing and may not yet have the skills needed to weigh or operate their rigs safely, to take such unnecessary risks. That in my view shows lack of regard for others' well being. |
|
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
Dirt Sifter
Senior Member
Joined: 30 Dec 2018 Location: Right side OR Online Status: Offline Posts: 170 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2022 at 9:29pm |
|
gpokluda, had you read the most recent posts you would have seen Mark didn't buy an Rpod (complete with pictures) and that he finished his trip without serious issues. He got things done well. Kinda the reason the admin's say to read all the posts before we write one.
|
|
|
Greg n Deb 2020 195 HRE
'07 Tundra 5.7L., '17 Tacoma 3.5L. Both with tow packages 1 Puggle, 1 Chihuahua support staff |
|
![]() |
|
MarkW
Groupie
Joined: 25 Jan 2021 Location: Michigan Online Status: Offline Posts: 56 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2022 at 4:55pm |
|
If you want to stick with your TV you may want to look at a trailer with a bit lower profile and higher ground clearance like some of the trail ready tear drops that are out there, but at the end of the day, you go with what you got.
Ours isn't a Pod, but similar in size and weight--probably closest to a 171 (no slide), but a little taller and wider. Anyway, ground clearance really wasn't a problem. We aren't trying to overland, just get into some dispersed sites that required a few bits of what I guess you'd say is light off-roading. Rougher than getting to some of the camp sites were a couple of long unpaved roads -- particularly Rock House Valley Road that stretches about 30 miles across Vermillion Cliffs. The problem was sections of washboard. Two things did go a little wrong that time. First, one of the rear stab jacks vibrated part way down and then did drag at one point and bent a little (but I was able to bend it back). The other was that our double rear dinette window wasn't fully latched and worked it's way partly open and ... the dust!!! Not a fun cleanup (I wished we had that propane-powered shop vac). But it was worth it get to the trailhead for the Buckskin Gulch slot canyon which is spectacular. Checking out the trailer post-trip is a good idea. We've been home a few days now and have done a thorough cleanout of the trailer and things look to no worse for wear.
|
|
![]() |
|
gpokluda
Senior Member
Joined: 11 Nov 2018 Location: East Idaho Online Status: Online Posts: 510 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 Apr 2022 at 2:29pm |
|
Hi Mark and welcome. Ditto what most of the replies have said. We do a mix of boondocking and hookups and for that, the Rpod works great. As others have said, rough roads are tough on the Pod so you will want to go slow and inspect the trailer on your return. Your TV may be a little light for the task at hand. If you want to stick with your TV you may want to look at a trailer with a bit lower profile and higher ground clearance like some of the trail ready tear drops that are out there, but at the end of the day, you go with what you got.
All the best! Keep us posted what you decide. |
|
|
Gpokluda
2017 Rpod 179(sold 2023) 2022 Escape 5.0TA 2022 Ford F150 4X4 3.5EB Honda SCL500 |
|
![]() |
|
MarkW
Groupie
Joined: 25 Jan 2021 Location: Michigan Online Status: Offline Posts: 56 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Apr 2022 at 8:43am |
|
We were within all rated limits for the tow vehicle -- just not x% below rated limits where x% is determined by no data, only by seat of the pants 'just to be safe' guessing. We never filled water or waste tanks and did not carry anywhere nearly enough gear to put us even close to 3500#. Tongue weight was close to, but under the rated 350#. Total TV loading was within rated limits as well. I know you think you need to add a 10% or 20% (or is it 30% -- how do you decide?) additional safety margin above and beyond the safety margin that the actual professional automotive engineers already designed into the vehicle. I disagree.
It wasn't just 4400# miles, it was driving, at times, in strong head and crosswinds, over multiple mountain passes, across long, rough unpaved roads (in Vermillion Cliffs and Escalante) and to dispersed camp sites that sometimes required 4WD and high-clearance. We had to do a panic stop when a jackass pulled out in front of us. It was a pretty thorough workout. It wasn't a high-heat workout (temps were never above the low 80s and mostly lower -- especially high in the mountains), but that's OK -- we have not intention of ever camping in really hot temperatures (yuck!) Probably not much point in going around and around more on safety margins. Happy camping (or farming)!
|
|
![]() |
|
offgrid
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Apr 2022 at 7:39am |
|
Ok, thread is awake.
I'm certainly happy to hear that nothing bad happened, but that doesn't change my view that this is dangerous behavior. 4000 miles without a problem is nowhere near an adequate data set. In safety engineering, unsafe activities recur many times but don't redult in injury or death until they do, meaning that statistics apply. The death rate from crashes in the US is about 1 per 100,000,000 miles. So you would need to have thousands of rigs like this on the road for years to obtain meaningful statistics. Lacking that you have to go with load capacity analysis and expert recommendations. So to new owners or soon to be owners, please get an adequate tow vehicle and don't let wishful thinking sway you to do something unsafe. There is always someone on the internet that will tell you whatever dangerous behavior you might want to do is OK. Don't believe it. |
|
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 16> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |