R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Introduce Yourself
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Prospective r-pod owner
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProspective r-pod owner

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
marwayne View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Location: Edmonton AB Can
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1004
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Prospective r-pod owner
    Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 10:21pm
Jules

We have a 172 we are in our fifth season love the bunks, I would not trade my 172 for any other pod.
If you want something done right, do it yourself.
2011 RP172, 2016 Tundra 5.7 Litre, Ltd.


Back to Top
techntrek View Drop Down
Admin Group - pHp
Admin Group - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 9:16pm
Originally posted by CharlieM

Note the National Forest sign, 10114 feet, in the picture.


We got our pod up over 10,000 last summer, that was cool!  Big smile
Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ Pod instruction manual
Back to Top
techntrek View Drop Down
Admin Group - pHp
Admin Group - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 9:09pm
According to an old post 200 pounds on the top, 300 pounds on the bottom.
Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ Pod instruction manual
Back to Top
Outbound View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 767
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 8:17pm
Somewhere back in my dusty memory a question/concern is milling around...  it may be nothing, or I may be confusing it with a different trailer...

What's the weight capacity of the upper bunk in a 172?
Craig :: 2009 RP171 towed by a 2017 F150
Back to Top
Mountainrev View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Location: Eagle, Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 193
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 7:22pm
Back to the topic:  I hope no one is offended by me alluding to bunks as kids' beds.  To each his own.  If you're comfortable with them, go for it.  But have you gone into a 172 and actually lied on them?  I would be claustrophobic in them, not only because of the low headroom, but the lack of windows. 

It sounds like you are looking for a lighter R-pod, that is, one without a slideout.  Have you looked at the 171?  As I mentioned above, with the dinette set down, you could both have beds without having to crawl on top of each other.  The dinette is a bit small, but with just one person on it, you can go diagonal.  This would give you two windows and no claustrophobic lack of headroom.  The weight difference between the 171 and the 172 is only about 80 lbs., so that shouldn't be a determining factor.

Again, check out as many floorplans as possible before making a decision.  We were set on getting a 171 until we checked out the 177 and 178 with the slideout.  The slideout makes it feel much larger and open (although they weigh a couple hundred pounds more). 
2014 177
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Turbodiesel

"I lift my eyes to the hills."
Back to Top
CharlieM View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Location: N. Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 7:02pm
Originally posted by Mountainrev

[QUOTE=CharlieM]

I know where that is!  Were you camping at Silverjack?  We did that (in our popup) a few years back.  A bear ran down the road ahead of us as we coming down Owl Creek Pass to Ridgway.  Neat place. 

(Sorry for the thread hijack!)


I believe we ended up at Big Cimarron GMUG USFS CG. I think Silverjack was closed for the season.

Charlie
Northern Colorado
OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD
PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD
Back to Top
Mountainrev View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Location: Eagle, Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 193
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 6:49pm
Originally posted by CharlieM

Note the National Forest sign, 10114 feet, in the picture.





I know where that is!  Were you camping at Silverjack?  We did that (in our popup) a few years back.  A bear ran down the road ahead of us as we coming down Owl Creek Pass to Ridgway.  Neat place. 

(Sorry for the thread hijack!)
2014 177
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Turbodiesel

"I lift my eyes to the hills."
Back to Top
CharlieM View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Location: N. Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 6:48pm
Yes, you are following our trail and thinking exactly. We went with the pod knowing it might not be the last camper we owned, but it really was the best starter for us and the Pilot. If we didn't like the RV camping life we wouldn't have lost a ton of money. Experience with the 172 made us much smarter when upgrade time came. Note the picture I added to an earlier post.
Charlie
Northern Colorado
OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD
PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD
Back to Top
Jules View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2015
Location: WI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 6:27pm
Sounds like we are following in your footsteps.  The only thing I am not thrilled about with the pod is the bathroom but we really don't want a bigger vehicle at this point.  All the campers we have looked at with the walk around bed and full shower weigh a lot more although both items are appealing.  As newbies moving from a tent, I am thinking it will be quite luxurious at first.  And you are right, this is a great forum!  I am learning a lot. 
Back to Top
CharlieM View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Location: N. Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Mar 2015 at 6:11pm
Yes, we had the 172 and selected it specifically for its light weight, bunk configuration, and bunk size. We did not want to climb over each other to get up at night. The 172 was our first camper after returning to the camping scene (retired, kids gone, tired of motels, etc). After the first year we decided to go a bit bigger, primarily for a larger fridge, dry bath, and walk-around queen, but it also required an upgrade to the tow vehicle. We loved our 172 and still consider ourselves Podders in spirit. This forum is one of the best around with lots of friendly folks and the answer to any questions you can think of. Note the National Forest sign, 10114 feet, in the picture.


Charlie
Northern Colorado
OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD
PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz