R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Warranty, Service and Recall Bulletins
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Safety Recall
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSafety Recall

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 8910
Author
Message
furpod View Drop Down
Moderator Group - pHp
Moderator Group - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Location: Central KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6128
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Safety Recall
    Posted: 25 Feb 2013 at 2:37pm
Originally posted by Burt

Spoilers and MPG.  We're somewhat lucky as our RPod is a 2012 171 HRE and it came with a spoiler and all the "required" running lights.  BTW, they are all LED and really light up nice.

Our MPG was best improved by putting in a performance chip in my opinion.  That, and using non-ethanol fuel in the tow vehicle when towing.  You get more power out of a gallon that way.  We have a Ford Ranger V6, 3.0 Liter FWD and are now getting 2 to 4 MPG better when towing with just a few runs tested.  The vehicle itself now gets 4 to 5 MPG better non towing and in town/out of town.  Over the road, there is a marked improvement in mileage without tow.

The chip we decided on was made by GF.  Most of the big diesel tow rigs that tow are now using performance chips and I seriously believe that the ford "Eco Boost," is not much more than an added performance chip.

Performance chips of the right type do not just dump fuel into your engine, they work WITH all the OEM components of an engine, viz., exhausts, vacuums, fuel input, computer and etc.  Thus, they can cause your tow vehicle to achieve better results and have more ooomph on the hills.

There's my 2 bits worth.

Burt


Well.. that and two turbochargers..
Back to Top
Burt View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 04 May 2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Feb 2013 at 6:10pm
OK, I give.  I'll see your two turbochargers and yet, my comment was rooted in the MPG column and what can be done by the average towvehicle without purchasing a new one.  My comment on the Eco Boost may have been out of the column.  Forgive me.

Burt
Back to Top
furpod View Drop Down
Moderator Group - pHp
Moderator Group - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Location: Central KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6128
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Feb 2013 at 10:54am
Originally posted by Burt

OK, I give.  I'll see your two turbochargers and yet, my comment was rooted in the MPG column and what can be done by the average towvehicle without purchasing a new one.  My comment on the Eco Boost may have been out of the column.  Forgive me.

Burt


Nothing to forgive.. it's all good.

I am not, as of yet a fan of the eco-boost.. but EVERYONE I have met running one LOVES it.

My brain goes to.. "just think what it would have been like had they put dual spools on the new 6.2..???!!!"  I am a fan of forced induction. This household has been home to at least one power adder since 1979.

No doubt at all that on most cars and trucks today, some added gains are available with a tuner. manufacturers have to build to a set standard, the one the EPA approved, and have a "safe tune" so that engines don't grenade. And, once you start playing with a tuner, you find that each engine will have a different setting even if minor, that makes it happiest.

I have played with it a lot with my Mustang, and with her GTi.. I know about 20 v-dubs running hot tunes, and on a couple the mods and equipment are exactly the same, but there may be as much as 10% difference in where that particular pair of engines max out.

In our case she is putting about 235 to the flywheel in her GTi, with a factory tune that was set at about 198. (In her case, mileage didn't change one way or the other with the tune.. but I don't think it's the cars faultLOL) Nothing changed but the tune, and the fact that we run 93 octane only, allows us to bump it up pretty good, but much further, and a) the gains aren't worth the risk to the engine and transaxle, and.. with FWD, things get pretty hairy when you go above 230 or so anyways. Her next Golf will be a "R" or R32, I am sure. (AWD)
Back to Top
techntrek View Drop Down
Admin Group - pHp
Admin Group - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9059
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Feb 2013 at 4:22pm
I've been considering an aftermarket adjustment for my truck since last year, but one thing that stopped me is my active warranty.  Didn't want to reprogram and end up with an issue they could trace back to it due to an invalid checksum.  Looks like that GF operates actively on the OBD-II so it isn't an actual reprogram.  Not all that expensive @ $69, either.  Hmmmmmm.....
Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ Pod instruction manual
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 8910

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz