R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Introduce Yourself
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: New and looking at my first RV purchase
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNew and looking at my first RV purchase

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
p40whk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2016
Location: Northern KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Direct Link To This Post Topic: New and looking at my first RV purchase
    Posted: 27 Apr 2016 at 10:04pm
Originally posted by Hour Pod

I believe it was the 2016 & 1/2 release that the garage (at least on 182G) changed to just large sink on right and flat counter on left, made of tin vs prior years being plastic. We like the flat left side for counter space to make sandwhiches, slice veggies, or set our coleman stove.

Not sure what year the model I looked at was but it had the two condiment recesses as well as the larger one with a drain. Not insulated at all so not really usable as a cooler. They would have been better off just making a cutout to fit a standard cooler that could be dropped in that space or given you some other storage option.

I do like the idea of the garage and was excited about it until I got a closer look at how it was laid out. I had done a lot of research into building a Teardrop Camper before I started looking into the R-Pods and there is a ton of innovation that people have done with those, surprised that Forest River didn't take some cues or use many of the great ideas that are so prevelant with the teardrop galleys.
Back to Top
Hour Pod View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 12 Mar 2016
Location: West Linn, OR
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Apr 2016 at 9:54pm
I believe it was the 2016 & 1/2 release that the garage (at least on 182G) changed to just large sink on right and flat counter on left, made of tin vs prior years being plastic. We like the flat left side for counter space to make sandwhiches, slice veggies, or set our coleman stove.
Love'N Hour Pod
2017 Sierra Crew & 2017 182G
JJ, Erin, Alexa & Jace
Back to Top
p40whk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2016
Location: Northern KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Apr 2016 at 11:08am
Originally posted by Retroactive

I agree that the "Garage" setup was not impressive when we viewed it. Skip the tent ends, you will be glad you did the first time you get sideways rain.

Sideways rain can be a bear!
Back to Top
Retroactive View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2016
Location: Bolton, MA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Apr 2016 at 9:20am
I agree that the "Garage" setup was not impressive when we viewed it. Skip the tent ends, you will be glad you did the first time you get sideways rain.
Back to Top
p40whk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2016
Location: Northern KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Apr 2016 at 7:37am
Got a chance to look at a 172, 177, 179, 180 and a 183G last night and was impressed with the quality compared to what I saw in the Palomini's I looked at before. The 172 had the 42" wide bunks and there was a placard on the top bunk that had a weight limit of 200 pounds. I was considering the 182G which has 30 inch wide bunks so I was concerned that would be too tight and not strong enough for a full size adult.

The dealer called the factory and they said the upper bunks on the 182G are only rated to 150 pounds. so that model is out for me. I found the 42 inch width to be plenty but couldn't imagine sleeping in a bunk that was only 30 inches wide.

I really liked the space and storage of the 179 and it was by far my favorite of the models I saw. They have some 182G's on order so I would like to look at those as well just to be sure and I'm still considering the 176 or 176T if I can figure out a way to strengthen the upper bunks on either of these models.

My other option is a Surveyor 191T (Not an R-Pod!) which is a Hybrid with a ton of room but I'm torn, I'm not sure I want the noise you get with tent ends. They are Surveyor delaers but didn't have any of those on the lot, I walked through a couple other surveyors and the quality of those models were of a higher standard than most I've seen.

I commented to the dealer that the cabinets in the Surveyor looked to be the same as the R-Pod and he said that they are built on the same assembly line (he complained that they alternate building each brand on a monthly basis and that he sometimes couldn't get R-Pods when he needed them).

The place I went to is Couch's RV Nation in Hamilton Ohio. It's only 20 minutes from where I work so it was a no brainer to head there. Not sure how true this is but they said they were the largest R-Pod dealer in the country (they probably had close to 100 on the lot). He quoted me prices for just about every model I was interested in but unfortunately didn't have the models I really wanted to see on hand.

Regarding the rear garage, I originally thought it was a great idea as a lot of the teardrop campers utilize space this way but after looking at the 183G I was not impressed at how it was set up. Love the huge sink but the other three recessed areas in the counter top seemed more of a waste of space. They would have been better off making one of those spots a cooler holder, not sure what the condiment recesses could be used for either but the whole area just seemed to be not as well planned.

My main take away from the 2 hours I spent sitting in the bathroom, lying on beds, sitting at each dinette, and walking interior traffic patterns is that these are well made campers compared to others in the same price range. They are small and a bit cramped but perfect for two people or two adults with two children. I don't see the size being conducive to four adults for anything more than short trips but myself and my companion would have no problem in a 179 for extended trips.

Now, the hard part! What model best suits me? I'd love to hear counters to my first impressions and things I hadn't thought of. Being new to this, you don't always know what to look for.
Back to Top
this_is_nascar View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Location: NJ
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Apr 2016 at 6:48pm
Welcome.
"Ray & Connie"

- 2017 R-Pod RP-180
- 2007 Toyota Tacoma TRD-Off Road
Back to Top
techntrek View Drop Down
Admin Group - pHp
Admin Group - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9059
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Apr 2016 at 6:37pm
If I remember right the bunks are good for 250 pounds.  One of the first threads on the forum mentioned the limit.

Definitely check out slide out and non-slide models.  Now that I own a camper with a slide I would never buy another w/o a slide.  Even on a large camper the difference is huge.
Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ Pod instruction manual
Back to Top
Retroactive View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2016
Location: Bolton, MA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Apr 2016 at 12:59pm
Definitely make sure you get to physically visit at least 3-4 floorplans, after that you should get a good feel for what the rest might feel like. Skip the tent ends, that stuff will eventually fail anyhow and then you are stuck in replacement parts hell..."ohhh, sorry, it's the spring rush, that's on a 4 week factory backorder." 
Back to Top
p40whk View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2016
Location: Northern KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Apr 2016 at 12:49pm
Originally posted by Retroactive

My wild guess is that the bunks are going to be more than adequate for the average adult. It's a liability issue, if it is meant for kids I would assume there would be a sticker on the bunk clearly stating the weight limit. Being and engineer, this is a case where we would want to "idiot proof" the situation. Some guy gets boozed up and unknowingly crawls into the top bunk; if the top one fails, and someone is sleeping underneath, now you have two people in the hospital. My guess is that it will hold 200 Lbs minimum.

Good logic and I never considered that! I'm a technical writer so I should have thought of that myself. Just can't assume anything these days though. 

I have friends trying to talk me out of the bunks already (even though they aren't RV owners). Also have other people telling me I should consider the hybrids. Not sure I want to hassle with the tent ends or not and you can't use them in campgrounds where bear are present.

A lot of things to consider but I'm sure it will come down to what feels comfortable once I've had the chance to get inside them.
Back to Top
Retroactive View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2016
Location: Bolton, MA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Apr 2016 at 12:44pm
My wild guess is that the bunks are going to be more than adequate for the average adult. It's a liability issue, if it is meant for kids I would assume there would be a sticker on the bunk clearly stating the weight limit. Being and engineer, this is a case where we would want to "idiot proof" the situation. Some guy gets boozed up and unknowingly crawls into the top bunk; if the top one fails, and someone is sleeping underneath, now you have two people in the hospital. My guess is that it will hold 200 Lbs minimum.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz