R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Reviews and General Information
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Shopping for a tow vehicle
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedShopping for a tow vehicle

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
ChinookPod View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2014
Location: Alberta
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 49
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Shopping for a tow vehicle
    Posted: 02 Mar 2015 at 10:15pm
Our 2010 F150 is like driving a chesterfield (aka sofa).  Got 16 L per 100 km, sorry don't know mpg, but not much more than without trailer.  Also like the tow/haul transmission that assists on the downgrades.
2014 RP171 HRE
2010 F150
Back to Top
ToolmanJohn View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Apr 2014
Location: Connecticut
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2015 at 7:23pm
You haven't said specifically what your budget is, and if the new TV must be new or can be used. If it was me , I would buy something that would allow for decent fuel economy when not towing, as well as leaving some tow capacity for towing a bigger trailer in the future. 

 If you can afford a diesel, get one. Good economy when not towing, very strong pullers. Very high torque outputs, HP really doesn't matter much.
2017 ATC 7X20 Custom Toy Hauler
2013 R-Pod 177 (SOLD)
2013 VW Touareg TDI
Back to Top
Keith-N-Dar View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Location: Mayville, WI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1447
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2015 at 6:58pm
I have done the calculations a few times to determine if it pays to have diesel.  So far it has not come out with the additional cost of equipment and fuel.  If I buy another TV I will do the math again.  Some day it may work out for me.
Keith-N-Dar
Boris & Betty (Boston Terriers)
2011 R-Pod 177
2010 Ford F-150
Back to Top
David and Danette View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1223
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Mar 2015 at 4:12pm
Originally posted by Podster

Hmm, I have heard it suggested that even though diesel cost more at the pump, the overall cost is less to operate because diesel is 33% more efficient. 

How about it diesel operators? Is this true? Is it cheaper in the long run to own and operate a diesel rig?
I read in a comparison between Fords new eco boost small 4 cylinder and the Chrysler eco diesel in their half ton trucks, that the Ford did better cost wise. Diesel fuel cost more than gasoline and that was taken into consideration. Mpg the eco diesel did do better than the eco boostl. But in towing that could change things I forget what the torque rating was between the two.
2018 Vista Cruiser 19BFD (2018-              
2012 Vibe 6503 (2014-2019)
2009 r-pod 171 (2009-2014)
Middle Tn
2014 Ram 1500 Quad cab


Back to Top
MikeGranberry View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Mar 2015 at 3:22pm
I'm towing the 179 with a Buick Enclave. Nice luxury along with good trailer package. Sway bar system works well with trailer brakes.  If we went to a larger TT, I would most likely go to a truck as TV.
Buick Enclave 2014
Rpod 179
Interested in cycling & kayaks
Back to Top
freezingalaskan View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 34
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jan 2015 at 12:10pm
techntrek,
I second your advice. I tow my 172 with a Volvo XC90 with 240hp 5000 lbs towing limit. I have been surprised at how well it tows. I always use the manual shift mode and never bother putting it in sixth gear.

If you need to compromise like I do on what you use your vehicle for, then techntrek's advice is spot on.

freezingalaskan
Volvo XC90 '13
rPod 179 '16
Back to Top
techntrek View Drop Down
Admin Group - pHp
Admin Group - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jan 2015 at 9:07am
Ignoring the pickup vs. SUV decision, the important factors are towing capacity, wheelbase, torque, hp.  In that order IMO.  I would go with 5000 lbs, 120 inches, 250 ft/lb, 250 hp, minimum numbers.
Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ Pod instruction manual
Back to Top
Camper Bob View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp


Joined: 26 Sep 2011
Location: Portland Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 913
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jan 2015 at 8:26am
Here is my two cents. We just recently went through the same hand ringing experience on which TV to purchase. We had a 2005 Chev. Tahoe with a 6,800 towing capacity. Mileage while towing was between 10-12 MPG at 55. After much consideration, test driving, reading reviews, etc. we purchased our first Japanese vehicle. The Nissan Pathfinder with a V-6 engine and a towing capacity of 5,000 lbs. Fits our needs perfectly. I did add a weight dist. hitch, since the wheelbase is shorter than the Tahoe and certainly lighter. We have only towed it to the dealer and back, about 10 miles total to have the WD hitch installed. I ordered the Pathfinder with the factory installed towing package. Our brake controller plugged right into the harness that Nissan provided. The trailer when towed with the new hitch on city streets and on the highway towed perfectly, without straining the Pathfinder. Our in city mileage has increased to about 18 MPG. Up from about 12 with the Tahoe. The new technology in the Nissan is most impressive. My vote goes to the Nissan Pathfinder. Not overcapacity which will drive down mileage, but a decent compromise. Not to mention the backup camera which makes hitching up a breeze. Curious what you finally end up with and why. Safe Travels.
Camper Bob and Camper Sue
Gracie the Wonder Dog (12 LB. Mini Dachshund)
2013 Rpod 171HRE(ORPod)
2016 Lance 1685
2015 Nissan Pathfinder
Back to Top
retireclose View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Location: Michigan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 50
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jan 2015 at 8:10am
We have  a 2014 Silverado 1500 5.3 and a 2015 179.   This is an awsome combo.  Two trips last year, Smokey moutains averaged 13.5 mpg, Yellowstone 12.9 mpg.  No need for WDH, we do have friction sway bar.
Gary and Jill Winters
Bella Golden Retriever
2014 Silverado 1500
2015 R-Pod 179 -(SOLD)
Back to Top
Craneman View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2013
Location: Tokeland,wa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jan 2015 at 10:58pm
Originally posted by Podster

Originally posted by Craneman

We have a 2011 f-150 with 3.5 v/6 eco boost that has 365 hp and pulls our 174 way better than our 2006 Chevy v/6 at about 190 hp. We have been very happy with it.

                    Moe and jo

Holy Smokes! 365HP out of a V6, thats freakin awesome!Thumbs Up
 


 When we first looked at the truck I ask the dealer if I brought our trailer to the dealership could we test drive with the trailer hooked up. He said just take it home over night and give it a good road test. We did and gave it a pretty good test. We bought it!!!!!
       Moe and Jo
Jo and Gary, 2010-174,2011 F150

Jo and Gary
2010 174
2011 Ford 150



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz