Mileage Per Gallon |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | ||
Seanl
Senior Member Joined: 19 Sep 2011 Location: Fredericton NB Online Status: Offline Posts: 633 |
Topic: Mileage Per Gallon Posted: 24 Jun 2013 at 11:01am |
|
Thanks for the answer Techntrek.
|
||
Sean, 2011 Rpod RP-173,2009 Jeep Liberty Rocky Mountain Edition
|
||
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Location: MD Online Status: Offline Posts: 9059 |
Posted: 24 Jun 2013 at 9:28am | |
I didn't change my towing habits, at least not intentionally. I would regularly tow at 65 with our old TV and if anything I tow a little slower now at 60-65 trying to get a little higher mpg. The amount of stuff we take hasn't changed. One thing that did change is the octane of the gas, but I don't see how that would affect the equation. I had to put 92 octane in our Sienna to squeeze out every available horsepower. It had variable valves and would only put out its maximum 215 hp with high octane gas. This was very noticeable to me on the few occasions where we towed with lower octane gas (usually the first trip of the season since we would put 87 in it over the winter). The Suburban only requires 87 octane and the manual doesn't even claim it will give you any more with a higher octane so 87 is what it gets.
|
||
Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ Pod instruction manual
|
||
Seanl
Senior Member Joined: 19 Sep 2011 Location: Fredericton NB Online Status: Offline Posts: 633 |
Posted: 24 Jun 2013 at 9:04am | |
techntrek Do you think that is because you tow faster with the more powerful TV? I know my terminal speed with any kind of head wind on the Jeep is 60MPG but with a little more horse power I would push it to 65 or 70.
|
||
Sean, 2011 Rpod RP-173,2009 Jeep Liberty Rocky Mountain Edition
|
||
Burt
Groupie Joined: 04 May 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 62 |
Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 9:24pm | |
Right, I agree. However, our chip and the filter helped. Most of these MPG type questions arise, I believe, from the faulty thinking right from the get go when we buy a "lighter" trailer. Most believe that the mileage won't be as bad as it truly is. The perceptions don't match the reality and we seek ways to make the original thought/perception more of a reality.
The original post I responded to was highly accurate. The bottom line is that 10 to 14 MPG is the reality unless you are towing downhill for about 50 miles. I agree with the lower speed concept and use it to our advantage. Best MPG to you and all, Burt |
||
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Location: MD Online Status: Offline Posts: 9059 |
Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 7:00pm | |
As shown in my last post, our mpg went down when we bought a larger TV. |
||
Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ Pod instruction manual
|
||
Burt
Groupie Joined: 04 May 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 62 |
Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 6:15pm | |
The performance chip we bought is an X3. Do your research for your own TV (Tow Vehicle). Performance chips are different and many just dump fuel into your engine.
Some are made just for manufacturers. Bottom line is that they almost bring a vehicle up to what it was supposed to do without all the green constraints. Burt |
||
Burt
Groupie Joined: 04 May 2012 Online Status: Offline Posts: 62 |
Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 6:13pm | |
The performance chip we purchased is an X3.
There are a lot of them out there. Research the one FOR your TV (Tow Vehicle). Burt |
||
Kickstart
Senior Member Joined: 20 Sep 2010 Location: Ocean Shores, W Online Status: Offline Posts: 267 |
Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 3:45pm | |
Here's a little more stuff, some from a previous post, that will back up what Tidalwave found with his study. Adding the wing to my Pod did only slightly increase my mileage when towing--less than a 1 mpg, but it was a consistent improvement. What I'm now finding most interesting is that 4 of my first 5 tanks after having the A/C installed there has been a further improvement of over a mile per gallon. I'm eager to see if this improvement will be consistent.
Also, while towing with my Tacoma I towed with an empty bed, with a tonneau cover, and with a cab high cap. There was no difference in towing mileage during any common trips. I think that was exactly what Tidalwave, or maybe it was what the other study found. Hey, the Pod is no different from any other T/T I've towed--they all push wind.
|
||
'10 RP 175-Replaced by 2014 Kodiak 173 QBSL
'12 Toyota Tundra '05 Sportster (half a Harley) Retired-We're on Beach Time! |
||
Keith-N-Dar
podders Helping podders - pHp Joined: 03 Apr 2011 Location: Mayville, WI Online Status: Offline Posts: 1447 |
Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 11:51am | |
And what is the TV? |
||
Keith-N-Dar
Boris & Betty (Boston Terriers) 2011 R-Pod 177 2010 Ford F-150 |
||
Anthony Valenzano
Groupie Joined: 09 Apr 2013 Location: Archbald Pa Online Status: Offline Posts: 44 |
Posted: 23 Jun 2013 at 10:46am | |
Burt - What performance chip did you buy?
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |