![]() |
Changing times |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 12> |
Author | |
hogone ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 2013 Location: St. Louis Online Status: Offline Posts: 1060 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 Jul 2022 at 2:59pm |
who the f**k really cares about about yours guys ramblings............and negativity......gets old and really doesnt matter to us simple people..........get a real life if able.......
|
|
Jon & Pam
2013 RP177 2010 F150 2017 HD Streetglide 2009 HD Lowrider CHEESEHEAD |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What you said is: "So the Schindler solar elevator is going to appeal to architects and building owners who want to appear to be green more than they actually are green." In other words, the actors want something to appear different from that which actually is. That is misrepresentation, which is a form of fraud.
Before you make representations of energy use on solar elevators, it would behove you to learn from some qualified elevator engineers who actually have experience with these products. Otherwise, it is just one more internet "opinion." This horse has been beaten to a pulp and is making a mess on the road.
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good grief.
Re kidding, I never said the skyscraper thing made any sense. I was as surprised as you were that it wasn't meant as satire. Note my Willy Wonka references. As for solar elevators, no one said anything about fraud. There are lots of bespoke architectural elements and systems, environmentally oriented and otherwise, that are intended to make statements supporting their owners personal or corporate positioning. Few actually make economic sense or are a good use of resources, but they don't need to be. Varicolored bespoke solar panels are one such. Ive done that for architects in the past, looks cool on the building facade but costs a ton and negatively impacts system performance. Never stopped anyone in the "green" architectural community from asking for them if they had a client with deep pockets. Solar elevators are another one of those. So is Thyssen's Wonkavator. Methinks that perhaps your favoring one over the other is more a matter of corporate loyalty than anything else. The energy flow for stand alone solar is what it is, it's not complicated. You don't get nearly as much solar energy in winter as summer in northern latitudes, so if you have an elevator which gets similar usage in all seasons it will either be underpowered in winter or overpowered in summer and either will be wasting energy part of the year or needing additional energy the other part, or both. No way around the first law of thermodynamics. Grid connection solves that, and I'm sure Schindler is doing exactly that behind the scenes, just deemphasizing it for marketing purposes. |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Before you condemn the Schindler and Ascensores Fain solar powered elevators, you might want to reach out to the their engineers to see how they're working. Clearly you haven't done so. Your blanket condemnation of them as only wanting to perpetrate a fraud by appearing to be "green" to building owners and architects and that such a system makes no practical sense is noting but pure rhetorical posturing with utterly no facts to support this baseless speculation. As for your claim that you were only kidding, well, ok, if you say so.
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was kidding about the Thyssen Wonavator.
It's not a day/night problem, batteries do take care of that. It's a summer/winter problem. Trust me I designed these systems for a living for 40 years. Off grid solar is never anywhere near as efficient as grid tied because of seasonal solar insolation variation. If you size the PV array for winter operation when the available insolation is low you will waste the excess energy production in summer to avoid battery overcharging. There is no way around that unless there is another place for the excess production to go, eg the grid. To do it with batteries you would need to install enough battery capacity to carry the load for smany months, which is totally cost and resource prohibitive. This is especially true in a northern climate like Europe where ppl tend to be most interested in this kind of thing. In northern Germany there is more than a 5x difference between June and December for example. So the Schindler solar elevator is going to appeal to architects and building owners who want to appear to be green more than they actually are green. If they really want to be green they'll install a conventional grid tied solar array and a conventional grid connected elevator system. As with Thyssen's Wonkavator, Schindler's off grid solar elevator sounds really cool but makes no practical sense. |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Thyssen mag-lev system has been an unmitigated disaster. It is phenomenally expensive to maintain, breaks more often than an R-Pod, is a true Rub Goldberg of moving parts that fails frequently. I've been away from the elevator business for a bit, but the hourly rates for a weekend call back is about $1,500 an hour for a repair team of 2 mechanics, portal to portal. I don't have any information on the energy consumption, but I doubt it is more efficient than a modern traction elevator with a VFVV drive ac gearless machine.
Another thing that is being missed is the fact that the busy time for elevators is mostly during daylight hours. So the sun doesn't shine very well when they want to spill the sand in the doorway. At night is the time when the elevators in most places are quiet. Not much direct solar is available at 2 am. Robots are another thing that is complication. I worked with a number of jobs where hospitals used robotic drug dispensaries. They drove all over the hospital and rode the elevators. It was wonderful. At least a couple times a month, usually on weekend nights, they'd crash into the hatch doors and knock them off the tracks so they couldn't close. Elevators don't run with open doors in ideal circumstances. The callback for the emergency repair team was usually around $8K or $9K. Helped pay for my friends boats and motorcycles, not to mention their very reasonable dues to IUEC Local 8. As for solar elevators, the left over electrons from the day's running are usually stored in batteries and used at night during times of low usage. Code limitations also restrict mixing elevator operation with other building systems. It may not be permitted to share the battery storage with other building systems. Solar power for solar elevators is roof mounted. Schindler has been one of the leaders of solar vertical transportation research. That was one of the reasons they were one of the sponsors of the Solar Impulse project. They learned a great deal of technical information they were able to transfer to vertical transportation systems.
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From what you describe as the energy profile of conventional cable based counterweighted elevators, it sounds like the skyscraper storage concept would work much better with the cable-less Thyssen maglev elevator technology the article refers to. The only problem I guess is it costs 5x what a normal elevator costs. But it can go sideways as well as up and down. Willy Wonka anyone?
As for a solar elevator, it's going to be better to just grid tie the solar instead. That way none of the energy is wasted when the batteries get full and elevator usage is low, it can get used elsewhere in the building or by other grid customers. Same problem happens with solar powered EVs, better to put the solar on the roof and grid tie it rather than on the car itself. |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Like I say, the author proposing this approach best talk to some elevator engineers. He's not quite clear on how elevators utilize energy. The heavy lifting for elevators is in the down direction because the counterweights weigh 1.6 times the weight of the cabin, with a cargo/passenger load evening out the balance of the weight. It also fails to account for the wear and tear, with the need for increased maintenance that would result from such heavy loads. And we haven't even touched on the energy consumed by the robots moving back and forth with heavy loads of the wet sand, which will inevitably get spilled into the elevator are leading to extraordinarily expensive repairs. This is a very complex "solution" that can be achieved by so many other simple means. It is a violation of the KISS rule in spades. When a quality elevator company, such as Otis, Schindler, Kone, Mitsubishi, or Thyssen buys into such a "solution." It will have some credibility. Until then, it's pretty much pie in the sky.
Here is a little more realistic approach: schindler-solar-elevator-powered-exclusively-by-sunlight-1765
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
not satire, apparently. someone spent quite a lot of time looking at this.
Here is a link to the researchers published study 0 Lift energy storage My thought is that post Covid everyone wants to work from home anyway. So why not just vacate the top half of all those high rise office buildings and use half of each building and half the elevators for energy storage? That still leaves half of each building for human use, let the robots and sand have the rest so nobody's feet need to be run over. |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Someone should talk to some elevator engineers about this. The proponents don't seem to be clear on how elevators work, not to mention the complexities of moving their wet sand. I assume this is satire.
For a good overview of new energy storage technology, there is a great series on YouTube, which I mentioned before, called Just Have a Think, that reviews emerging technologies for energy capture and storage. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=just+have+a+think
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |