Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
P&M
Senior Member
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 454
|
Topic: Mileage Per Gallon Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 2:22pm |
There's been a lot of discussion regarding how many mpg's we all get when towing our Pods. What I am curious about is this:
For those of you that have had other types of trailers prior to your Pod, both larger and smaller, did you get better or worse mileage towing them? Or was it about the same?
|
P & M ... and Comet too!
2012 171 -- The Monkey Pod
2018 Ram 2500
|
 |
hogone
Senior Member
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Location: St. Louis
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1060
|
Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 2:43pm |
This is the first camping trailer I have had, but did have a 6X12 enclosed motocycle trailer. Weight of trailer around 1200 pounds, add two bikes add another 1300 pounds; some gear 200 pounds; total 2700 pounds; got around 12-14 MPG, same as the pod.
|
Jon & Pam
2013 RP177
2010 F150
2017 HD Streetglide
2009 HD Lowrider
CHEESEHEAD
|
 |
hogone
Senior Member
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Location: St. Louis
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1060
|
Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 2:49pm |
I guess I should indicate this is with the same TV; F-150 V8-4.6L 4X4
|
Jon & Pam
2013 RP177
2010 F150
2017 HD Streetglide
2009 HD Lowrider
CHEESEHEAD
|
 |
Kickstart
Senior Member
Joined: 20 Sep 2010
Location: Ocean Shores, W
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 267
|
Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 4:31pm |
1. 1991 Aljo 17'/1992 S-10 4.3 v6-10-14 mpg
S-10 best non towing mpg tank was 28 mpg (35 mph day around Yellowstone)
2. 1994 Layton20'/1992 S-10 4.3 v/6 and 1997 F150 4.6 v8/9-12 mpg
F150 best non towing tank was 17.9 mpg
3. 1998 Arctic Fox 22'/F150 4.6 v8/8-11 mpg
4. 2005 Chalet 18' foldable hardside (low tow height)/F150 4.6 v/8 & 2007 3.7 v6 Dakota/10-15 mpg
Dakota best non towing tank was 22.6 mpg
5. 2010 RP 175 2007 3.7 v6 Dakota/ 9-11 mpg 3 trips only
2006 4.0 Toyota Tacoma v/6 10-12.5 mpg 18 trips over 1.5 yrs
2012 4.6 Toyota Tundra v/8 10.5-14.3 mpg 20 trips over 1.5 yrs
Tacoma best non towing tank was 22.8 mpg
Tundra best non towing tank was 23.7 mpg
All Pod trips have been from 2 to 7 days in length. Notice that while towing the Pod, the bigger the tow rig I had, the better the towing mpg. That may not be a constant for everyone, but that's what it has been for me. I have hand figured nearly every tank of gas for the past 44 years of driving, and that's not nearly as anal as my mom. She still has notebooks covering date, gas purchased, price, and mpg for a LOT of driving years. Oh, Mom! Just about time to take away the keys.
|
'10 RP 175-Replaced by 2014 Kodiak 173 QBSL
'12 Toyota Tundra
'05 Sportster (half a Harley)
Retired-We're on Beach Time!
|
 |
hogone
Senior Member
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Location: St. Louis
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1060
|
Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 4:42pm |
wow, great stats
|
Jon & Pam
2013 RP177
2010 F150
2017 HD Streetglide
2009 HD Lowrider
CHEESEHEAD
|
 |
dsmiths
Senior Member
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Location: Southern Ind
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 866
|
Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 10:01pm |
I have not made any long pulls, most of our trips are close to home (both still work) trips are 70 to 100 miles round trip. I used to pull at 70 mph and got about 10 or 11 mph, then dropped to 60, now I try to keep it at 55mph and in the right lane. 45 up steep hills. We did a 80 mile round trip last week and I got 14.7 but kept it down to 55 or lower. when you double the velocity the drag goes up by 4. when I hit 60mph it feels like I am pulling a parachute. t.v. is a 08 chevy trailblazer 4.2 in line 6 , 295 hp.
|
Dane and Donna Smith
2011 RP-172
2008 Chevrolet Trailblazer 4X4
lift kit
prodigy wireless brake controller
|
 |
2Peas-n-Rpod
Groupie
Joined: 05 Jun 2011
Location: Nampa, ID
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 96
|
Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 10:55pm |
I have a Ford f150 5.4L V8 4x4. We have towed a Pod and a 26 ft. Prowler with this truck, and both were about 8-10 mpg. Like dsmiths said above, if I keep the speed 55 or under, I get around 10-11 with the Pod. With my little 6X10 1200 lb. utility trailer in tow, I get around 12-14, mostly stop and go traffic in town with it. Best mileage for this truck is about 17-18 mpg.
|
2011 R-Pod 182G Hood River Edition
"Ribbitt" Pod (now sold)
2000 Ford F150 5.4L V8 TV
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 21 Jun 2013 at 10:58pm |
Prior TV, Toyota Sienna: 23 mpg commuting 16 mpg towing popup which weighed close to 3500 pounds loaded 8-12 mpg towing pod which is close to 3000 pounds loaded (8 mpg was with a severe headwind, usually closer to 12)
Current TV: 17.5 mpg commuting 14 mpg towing utility trailer loaded with 3500 pounds 9.5 mpg towing the pod, so far
|
|
 |
TIDALWAVE
Senior Member
Joined: 21 Nov 2009
Location: MINNESOTA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 315
|
Posted: 22 Jun 2013 at 9:09am |
 From computer simulations another guest and I ran independently a couple of years ago, mpg while towing depends little on weight (in non-hilly areas). The most important factor was the frontal area of the trailer. The gap between the tow vehicle and the trailer also was a factor. R-Pods are about 11 feet high and 6 feet wide. From member responses, the size of the tow vehicles engine does not seem to matter much for mpg. The variations tend to be from 10 to 14 mpg. The rounded shape of the Pods does NOT contribute to increased mpg...the rounded frontal shape produces a much larger spacing between the tow vehicle and the Pod. This allows air rushing behind the tow vehicle more room to 'swirl' and thus produce more drag. You may notice the fiberglas sheathing behind a big rig semi cab and the trailer, decreasing the distance of the open gap between the two. The rear 'clearance lights' spoiler will do little to increase mpg. It is just too small. A 'pop-up' trailer, of the same weight as the Pod, will deliver a significant increase in mpg because its frontal area while being towed is much smaller than a Pod.
|
TIDALWAVE
|
 |
David and Danette
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1223
|
Posted: 22 Jun 2013 at 10:03pm |
I watched a video of a radius shaped front trailer same weight and same length as a trailer with a V shaped front towed by the same TV and using same gas from same pump traveling identical routes wind direction and speed the same. The V shaped trailer had the better MPG. but not by much. I don't know if any of the trailer manufactures test there trailers to have the best shape for MPG as the automobile industry does. Perhaps that will be something commonly done in the future as fuel prices get higher. It would be a good competitive selling point. Lite weight is a popular selling point now for best MPG. David
|
2018 Vista Cruiser 19BFD (2018-
2012 Vibe 6503 (2014-2019)
2009 r-pod 171 (2009-2014)
Middle Tn
2014 Ram 1500 Quad cab
|
 |