![]() |
AT Tires R Pod 171 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 6> |
Author | |
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 22 Jan 2023 at 1:21pm |
The Ralph Nader model of the Corvair commands a pretty good price too. In good shape, north of $20K.
Were they designed by bean counters or lawyers looking for roll over cases to defend?
![]() |
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
gpokluda ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Nov 2018 Location: NM Online Status: Offline Posts: 399 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ironically, a fully restored Pinto will command $8K to $15K these days. About 3-4 times of what they cost new.
|
|
Gpokluda
2017 Rpod 179(sold 2023) 2022 Escape 5.0TA 2022 Ford F150 4X4 3.5EB Kawasaki KLR650 |
|
![]() |
|
hank*pod ![]() Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Oct 2022 Location: PA Online Status: Offline Posts: 63 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
https://philosophia.uncg.edu/phi361-matteson/module-1-why-does-business-need-ethics/case-the-ford-pinto/
|
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dang, jon, you gotta read those warning labels.
![]() |
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
hogone ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 2013 Location: High Ridge, MO Online Status: Offline Posts: 1060 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
dam, i crashed the batcycle
![]() ![]() |
|
Jon & Pam
2013 RP177 2023 F150 2017 HD Streetglide CHEESEHEAD |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Who ever said engineers, or anyone else, is infallible?
Didn't I just point out that you can usually tell an engineering dominated company because the products will tend to be complex and relatively expensive with lots of obscure features. Not particularly good things. Nor did I say that lawyers and accountants don't add value. Quite the opposite. What I said was that lawyers and accountants arent where the core value resides in a company that builds products. They aren't what makes that company great. They are there to preserve value created by others. So absolutely they have value to add but they shouldnt run the place, any more than an engineer or manufacturing manager should run a law firm. If that's not obvious I don't know what else to say. The very best manufacturing companies understand that their core value is in design, manufacturing, or customer service, and are excellent there, but are also very very good at the other two. And they also have proper checks and balances on the legal and finance sides. And importantly the corporate leaders demonstrate due respect for all the above. Sadly, FR seems to be almost entirely sales dominated, with seemingly little thought left over for design excellence, quality, reliability, or, based on some of their claims, perhaps for legal considerations either. Not sure where they are on the accounting and finance end of things, but I'll bet they're pretty good there or ol' Warren wouldn't have invested. |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nor did the engineers who came up with the explosive Ford Pinto design add much value to Ford or its customers who bought one.
Engineers are not infallible and are not gawds any more than are lawyers, bean counters, sales people or the folks who clean the factory floor. Everyone should, but sadly doesn't, try to add value through his or her work. But no one, in the grand scheme of things, is really any better or worse than anyone else. Value is an utterly subjective concept that can be interpreted anyway you like. We all like to believe we add it in our work, but none of us is truly objective about the worth of what we do. |
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No argument that lawyers and accountants (both of whom are there to clean up messes or to keep them from occurring) often get blamed for others mistakes.
But here's the thing. Unless the business is a law or accounting firm the value it adds for the customer isn't created by the lawyers or accountants, so they shouldn't have to much decision making power. In a company that makes stuff the value is created by the engineers who design the stuff, the manufacturing people who make it, and/or the sales and marketing folks who figure out what the customers need and how to explain it to them. The role of the lawyers and accountants is to not squander that value by avoiding stupid mistakes. That's all good and very necessary. What I've seen happen though, is that after a company gets older, larger, and more profitable those "value preservation" folks tend to often become too powerful and as a result the company can lose sight of what made it great to begin with. |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In my experience lawyers are a lot like the guys with the brooms and shovels who follow the circus parade, except they get the blame for the mess they're hired to clean up. They usually don't make the decisions that make the problem, but when the problem happens and they have to clean up the mess someone else makes, they get the blame because they're visible and in the middle of the fight. In most companies, their job is to warn of dangers, but it's up to others to make the decisions whether to take the advice. I'm sure it wasn't up to the lawyers to decide the cost benefit analysis of the engineering failure of the explosive Ford Pinto, for example. ...It was probably accountants.
Product development is like making sausage. If you examined it in detail it would make you feel really queasy. Everyone makes mistakes, passes the buck, and tries to claim credit for what others did. ... then they hire lawyers to clean up the legal messes they got themselves into. ...And there are plenty of lawyers who make the messes even worse. A world run by engineers, manufacturing process people, sales people, accountants and lawyers, would be pretty ugly place. Come to think of it.............
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
offgrid ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some companies start out being run by engineering, some by manufacturing, and some by sales. You can generally tell which is which.
If it's engineering then they will have the coolest gadgets with lots of obscure features. The product will probably work well if you know what your doing but it won't be cheap. And you'll have a hard time figuring out what all the features are because they won't do a great job advertising them. If it's manufacturing then there will only be a few options if any, the product will always be kinda behind the curve, but quality will be good and it will be cost competitive in it's market. If it's sales then the product will never stay the same for long, it will have all the latest features, but either the quality won't be the best or it will be expensive, or both. You'll for sure know what the features are though because they will all be named and hyped up in ads. Guess which type of company FR is? That suspension ad is a perfect example. Beast mode? ![]() One of those ways tends to be how companies become successful. But then eventually they get big and want to hang onto all those hard earned dollars. At that point they might get taken over by the accountants or the lawyers. Those are the folks who come to the planning meetings and say "no" to the engineering, manufacturing, and/or sales folks. If that happens the company will stop making the cool gadgets, the best value products, or the latest new thing, whichever one made it successful in the first place. Instead it will focus on making as many beans as possible on each widget or on avoiding lawsuits, or both. At that point the end is usually near... And please before any lawyers or accountants here take offense, I'm not saying they're not needed, just that they shouldn't run the place. So actually I'm kinda glad to see that silly ad, shows that at FR sales still runs the show and the lawyers and accountants haven't taken over yet... Not that I'd ever buy an another FR product though. I've gone for stodgy quality this time round with my old Chinook. Man that thing is built like the proverbial brick outhouse. Just trying to cut a hole in it to put in a window a/c is taking hours and a sawsall. In my rpod I coulda done it in a couple of minutes with some tin snips. ![]() |
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12345 6> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |