50 or 30 amp

What serves readers of the board is informed fact-based information that can affect rPod owners.  Opinions based on incomplete knowledge, ill founded beliefs, and, on occasion, personal prejudice that one’s preferences are the best while others are just plain wrong, don't serve the readership.

Mike, who anointed you to be the arbiter of whose posts are written with the intention share helpful information and who is on an ego trip?  Where did you acquire the clairvoyant powers to enter the mind of other contributors and divine their innermost intentions?  Why is it that when you disagree with what others say, instead of challenging the facts, you react with dismissiveness and hostility?  No one obliged to read any thread or post.  If you don’t want to participate in the conversation, just skip the thread and let others be the judge of what they want to read or write about.  If no one is interested, the thread will die a natural death.

Do you disagree with what I said about the law of civil liability as it applies to responsibility for taking known risks?  Please, sir, correct me.  I am open to hearing other views and welcome your alternative facts.  I would love to be proven wrong.

Do you think the engineers who commented in this thread were wrong?  If so, show us your calculations and your science-based analysis.  Show us where their assessment that high enough impedance could occur using a 50/30A dogbone to start a fire is erroneous.  Show us facts that refute Forest River’s decision to warn against the use of such an unprotected dogbone.  If I recall correctly, in an earlier post you conceded the correctness of the engineers’ analysis.  Indeed, if we had to pay for all the free engineering advice they have graciously shared, whether on electrical issues, brakes, axle loading, trailer balance, etc. we would be broke.  We owe these guys a debt of gratitude, not accusations that they are doing this to show off.