Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Topic: New member Posted: 19 Jan 2016 at 11:55am |
Congrats. Only downside to that model year is the 4-speed transmission was standard until around 2009. Virtually no difference in the final ratios in 3rd and 4th, but the newer 6-speeds (and 8-speeds) go a lot deeper in 1st and 2nd which is good for heavy loads off the line. Really a nitpick for something like the pods.
|
|
 |
Rupert
Newbie
Joined: 10 Aug 2015
Location: NE Florida
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11
|
Posted: 18 Jan 2016 at 5:59pm |
Thanks for help! Landed with a 2006 Suburban 1500, 3.42 rear end, 5.3L, V-8. Ready to pack the fiddle, banjo, and wifey and head West on I-10!
Fun starts in March after a short shake-down cruise!
|
 |
Rupert
Newbie
Joined: 10 Aug 2015
Location: NE Florida
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11
|
Posted: 29 Dec 2015 at 9:58am |
Thank you. Your input is really appreciated. I'm taking notes.
Tom
Rupert the I-Pod
|
 |
Guests
Guest Group
|
Posted: 29 Dec 2015 at 7:52am |
Originally posted by Rupert
Help.... Have a RP-177 (3,500 pounds fully loaded) and I'm ready to upgrade from a V-6, 4.2L Chevy Trailblazer to an 8 cylinder. The Trailblazer does ok in flat Florida and I pulled the RP out of Tenn. but I'm nervous about the rpm's I pulled to maintain 50 to 55mph up 8% grades. I'm new to towing anything bigger than a pop-up trailer and am planning a two month trip across SW to California, up to Oregon or Washington then back through Colorado to the SW and home to North FL.
Any favorite V-8 vehicles?
Any other thoughts?
Moderator post just appeared and is very helpful. |
If you are a "Chevy person", I like my 5.3L V8. This is coupled to a 6speed transmission and 3.42 gears. It has handled anything that I have asked of it. I would avoid the smaller Chevy V8 (4.8L ?). It's numbers are much lower and what power it does develop is way up in the RPM range.
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 28 Dec 2015 at 9:47pm |
Any of the modern 8 cylinder full-sized trucks that are designed for towing will be fine. One key for towing is to get the longest wheel base you can. That gives you more stability and it is less affected by sway. In our case we preferred an SUV since we carry people a lot, and use a utility trailer to carry the messy loads.
|
|
 |
Rupert
Newbie
Joined: 10 Aug 2015
Location: NE Florida
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11
|
Posted: 28 Dec 2015 at 7:38am |
Help.... Have a RP-177 (3,500 pounds fully loaded) and I'm ready to upgrade from a V-6, 4.2L Chevy Trailblazer to an 8 cylinder. The Trailblazer does ok in flat Florida and I pulled the RP out of Tenn. but I'm nervous about the rpm's I pulled to maintain 50 to 55mph up 8% grades. I'm new to towing anything bigger than a pop-up trailer and am planning a two month trip across SW to California, up to Oregon or Washington then back through Colorado to the SW and home to North FL.
Any favorite V-8 vehicles?
Any other thoughts?
Moderator post just appeared and is very helpful.
|
 |
Guests
Guest Group
|
Posted: 26 Nov 2015 at 4:15am |
My take on the matter, speaking in generalities, is that there is no ideal vehicle. If there were, we would all own one.
Capable towing verses economical everyday driving is comparing apples to oranges. They are 2 different tools, for 2 different jobs. It is like saying I want a saw that will cut wood well but, I also want it to behave like a hammer, when I need that. A vehicle that will tow reasonably well isn't going to be particularly fuel efficient. A fuel efficient vehicle isn't going tow particularly well.
A compromise usually yields something that does not excel at either goal, in this case. A number of the old timers that tow, actually have 2 vehicles:
One (economical) for everyday driving and
Another (powerful), usually a big truck, for towing (parked most of the time).
One approach would be to keep the truck for towing and hauling (only) and purchase a Prius or Civic (for example) for daily driving - if this is feasible.
In my personal situation, the math doesn't work. I don't do enough "other" driving to warrant the 2nd vehicle. It is less expensive for me to just pay the extra at the pump while driving my bigger, less fuel efficient truck.
PS-Welcome to the forum!
|
 |
CharlieM
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Location: N. Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1797
|
Posted: 25 Nov 2015 at 9:17pm |
One point on MPG: The gas mileage while towing is almost entirely determined by the trailer, not the tow vehicle. That's because the trailer is like a parachute and it takes a predetermined amount of horsepower to tow it. The smaller engines will get better mileage when NOT towing, but all engines will be in the 10-13 MPG range when towing an RPOD at 60MPH. Speed has a big effect so you will see a difference between 55 and 60MPH. Above 65MPH you'll need a tanker following you.
|
Charlie
Northern Colorado
OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD
PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD
|
 |
codycountry
Senior Member
Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Location: Wyo
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 168
|
Posted: 25 Nov 2015 at 6:50pm |
Check out the Dodge 1500 diesel. The guys I know that have them are getting 30 plus mpg running empty, and above 18mpg towing. They have the 4x4 versions.
|
 |
MNFrBrit
Newbie
Joined: 21 Nov 2015
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
|
Posted: 25 Nov 2015 at 6:14pm |
Thanks for the info. We did really like the Pilot, still don't know but might get that. It sounds like we'll need a WDH though. We haven't driven the Tacoma yet so we'll see. Thanks!
|
 |