Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Topic: Shopping for new TV ~ need advice Posted: 07 Jul 2011 at 9:15pm |
Originally posted by Snowbound
Yes, Tom noticed that when we were driving 100 km/hour (your 60) the mileage was bad but when we were doing 90-95 the mileage was better.
It will be interesting to see how we do on our next big trip, Alberta to Ontario, later this month. Will we pay the price and sleep in or get moving a little sooner to save some $$? We don't have to go to bed when it gets dark anymore now that we have the Gastropod AND it's a lot easier to sleep in without the sun coming through the walls and heating up the tent.  |
Well, I vote you sleep in and enjoy!  In doing the math, 1 or 2 miles per gallon just doesn't add up to a whole lot of money. Like me, you bought a camper and a new tow vehicle to pull it with (translate: a bunch of money). Personally, I intend to enjoy the journies .....what's 2 or 3 more dollars (spent on fuel) at this point! 
|
 |
Snowbound
Senior Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
|
Posted: 07 Jul 2011 at 6:46pm |
Yes, Tom noticed that when we were driving 100 km/hour (your 60) the mileage was bad but when we were doing 90-95 the mileage was better.
It will be interesting to see how we do on our next big trip, Alberta to Ontario, later this month. Will we pay the price and sleep in or get moving a little sooner to save some $$? We don't have to go to bed when it gets dark anymore now that we have the Gastropod AND it's a lot easier to sleep in without the sun coming through the walls and heating up the tent. 
|
Tom and Bette
in our 177 "The Gastropod"
|
 |
Guests
Guest Group
|
Posted: 07 Jul 2011 at 4:21pm |
Originally posted by Snowbound
On our Canada Day excursion we averaged 11.3 mpg -about split 50/50 between city and highway driving.
B |
That sounds about what most everyone averages. It is about what I got when I had my RP173.
One thing that is interesting in comparing the Pod to my conventionally shaped (square back) TT is that the Pod seems to get a little better mileage when towed at speeds of 55mph or less. My existing TT pretty much stays the same regardless of the speed.
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 06 Jul 2011 at 10:27pm |
Not too bad.
|
|
 |
Snowbound
Senior Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
|
Posted: 06 Jul 2011 at 3:00pm |
On our Canada Day excursion we averaged 11.3 mpg -about split 50/50 between city and highway driving.
B
|
Tom and Bette
in our 177 "The Gastropod"
|
 |
Guests
Guest Group
|
Posted: 16 Jun 2011 at 2:24pm |
Originally posted by Snowbound
Turns out Tom had turned on the mileage log on the trip thing-y and we got 11.3 miles to the gallon on the trip to Lacombe. This is with the addition of over 500 lbs of stock being carried split between the TV and pod and also a full tank of freshwater. As well, we had the usual, some food, clothing, etc. but I did remove the dome, floor mat and lawn chairs in the interest of fuel economy
B |
I used to bungee my chairs to the top of my Pod in the unfolded/open position. Not only did this hurt the fuel mileage but, the bugs made a real mess on the chairs. I found that folding them up and putting them in the storage compartment helped with both problems.  
It sounds like the new TV is going to work out great for you. 
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 16 Jun 2011 at 1:53pm |
Those floor mats are a real mpg killer!
|
|
 |
Snowbound
Senior Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
|
Posted: 16 Jun 2011 at 11:10am |
Turns out Tom had turned on the mileage log on the trip thing-y and we got 11.3 miles to the gallon on the trip to Lacombe. This is with the addition of over 500 lbs of stock being carried split between the TV and pod and also a full tank of freshwater. As well, we had the usual, some food, clothing, etc. but I did remove the dome, floor mat and lawn chairs in the interest of fuel economy
B
|
Tom and Bette
in our 177 "The Gastropod"
|
 |
Snowbound
Senior Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
|
Posted: 14 Jun 2011 at 11:18am |
I guess our theory is we've bought the Pod and Durango so why worry about the mileage now. We've kept a mileage log for years for income tax purposes but I don't think we ever broke it down to kilometers per litre /miles per gallon.
I forgot to get a new log book for the Durango for the trip before we left. It's on my list now.
B
|
Tom and Bette
in our 177 "The Gastropod"
|
 |
Outbound
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 767
|
Posted: 13 Jun 2011 at 10:20pm |
I'd bet mileage was in the 10-12 mpg (19.6 - 23.5 l/100km) range... it seems unavoidable.
That said, I did get 16.8 l/100km (14 mpg) while towing at 90 km/h (56 mph) last weekend.
|
Craig :: 2009 RP171 towed by a 2017 F150
|
 |