Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
jnsluft
Newbie
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Topic: Possible to add a temporary or hinged bunk? Posted: 28 Aug 2011 at 4:59pm |
We have decided that our new camper will be an r-pod. We've seen most of the models and pretty much decided between a 172 and a 177. We have to decide who gets to sleep on the table. Mom and dad, or the 6yr old. Our daughter really likes the bunk beds in the 172, and it would make sense if a second child comes along. The 177 would let us sleep on a bed, and make the kid sleep on the table. But then there would be no room for a fourth person.
So, as my questions asks, what could be done, if anything to make a temp or hinged bunk to be placed above the table area?
Thanks, Shawn
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 28 Aug 2011 at 7:21pm |
Welcome, jnsluft!
As long as you make sure to tap into the supports I don't see why you couldn't add something above the dinette on the 177. Just attaching it to the wall won't work.
|
|
 |
pmjensen
Senior Member
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Location: South Texas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 179
|
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 at 11:41am |
Have you looked at the 176. Even though there are only 2 of us we find the slide just give us that little bit more room. We use the bunks for storage. Enjoy the looking process.
|
2011 R-176 Nuestro Pod
2014 Silverado
|
 |
jnsluft
Newbie
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Posted: 29 Aug 2011 at 10:34pm |
Near us there are two used Pods. A 2010 172, and a '11 177. We like the 172 for it's price. The 177 has a slide-out and a full size bed, but it's 3K more at their asking price. It comes down to who has to sleep on the table. Me and my wife, or our 6yr old daughter. The downside to the 177, is it only sleeps three. It would be nice to have the extra sleeping room for a second kid. That is why I inquired about the possibility of adding a temporary bunk.
Shawn
|
 |
furpod
Moderator Group - pHp
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Location: Central KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6128
|
Posted: 30 Aug 2011 at 8:04am |
I see no reason the 177 couldn't sleep two youngsters. I have shared the dinette bed with a 100lb dog.. two kids should fit fine.
|
 |
Chuck
Senior Member
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Location: Waukesha WI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 140
|
Posted: 30 Aug 2011 at 10:42am |
We have a 177 and our grandsons, 4 & 7, share the dinette. If you have an infant that could be a different story.
|
Z-pod
Chuck Janet & Bogie the dog
'12 RP 177
1972 Shasta 1400
2005 Ford F-150 5.3L V8
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 30 Aug 2011 at 12:18pm |
Both of our kids, 9 and 11, sleep on our 171's dinnette. The 171's dinnette is identical to the 177 (the layout is nearly the same, too).
|
|
 |
jnsluft
Newbie
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Posted: 31 Aug 2011 at 7:24am |
Originally posted by techntrek
Both of our kids, 9 and 11, sleep on our 171's dinnette. The 171's dinnette is identical to the 177 (the layout is nearly the same, too). |
You are right. Thank you for pointing that out. I went back to the manual, and discovered that the 171's dining table is larger than in the 177. I think we need to go back and take a longer look at the 171. We have been putting more effort into looking at the used models (a 172 and 177), that we've overlooked the one that may be the best for us.
Thanks, Shawn
|
 |
furpod
Moderator Group - pHp
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Location: Central KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6128
|
Posted: 31 Aug 2011 at 8:13am |
Originally posted by jnsluft
Originally posted by techntrek
Both of our kids, 9 and 11, sleep on our 171's dinnette. The 171's dinnette is identical to the 177 (the layout is nearly the same, too). |
You are right. Thank you for pointing that out. I went back to the manual, and discovered that the 171's dining table is larger than in the 177. I think we need to go back and take a longer look at the 171. We have been putting more effort into looking at the used models (a 172 and 177), that we've overlooked the one that may be the best for us.
Thanks, Shawn |
Umm... just a note.. both 177 and 171 have a dinette that is 42x74. The floor plan is exactly the same on those two, except for the fridge placement, one is on the right hand side of the kitchen, the other on the left. The only functional difference is the slide.. worth every penny in our opinion. OH, and on one you face forward when "reading" and in the other you face the rear.. lol http://www.forestriverinc.com/nd/default22.asp?page=floor&choice=rpod&nav=rec EDIT: occurred to me to look at the brochure.. Looking at the brochure that was in our pod when we bought it... I see it says there is a larger dinette... We didn't notice a difference when looking at them on the lot.. but, have to admit, it wasn't/isn't a concern to us. The dogs never complain about their sleeping areas..lol Children may be different.  I can see where they could make it a bit wider, since they don't have the slide seal and stuff to deal with.
|
 |
techntrek
Admin Group - pHp
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Location: MD
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9062
|
Posted: 31 Aug 2011 at 9:57am |
The current specs online say they are the same size, and when I looked at a 177 recently it looked like the same size. Its the same body and except for the flipped kitchen as furpod mentioned, otherwise identical so I don't see how the dinnette could be different in different models, unless they shortened it on the 177 to allow more room to get around the fridge.
|
|
 |