| Author |    Share Topic  Topic Search  Topic Options | 
 
  | TheBum   Senior Member
 
   
 
 Joined: 26 Feb 2016
 Location: Texas
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 1407
 |  Topic: Difference Between a Trunnion and Round Spring Bar Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 3:59pm
 | 
 
  | 
   I use a round bar on my 3.5L V6 Highlander, also rated 5000 pounds.
    | 
 
  |  | 
 
  | CharlieM   Senior Member
 
   
   
 Joined: 23 Nov 2012
 Location: N. Colorado
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 1797
 |  Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 3:59pm | 
 
  | 
   E2 600/6000. Probably the most popular WDH with RPOD owners. I towed a 172 for thousands of miles for 1.5+ years with a Pilot. Still using the E2 on a larger TT/TV combo. 
    | 
 
  | 
     Charlie
Northern Colorado
 OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD
 PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD
 | 
 
  |  | 
 
  | john in idaho   Senior Member
 
   
   
 Joined: 04 Nov 2014
 Location: Eagle Idaho
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 613
 |  Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 3:42pm | 
 
  | 
   And look at the Andersen hitch, which is an entirely different principle - uses the compression of hard polyurethane -like on the down movement , and the relaxation of the chain on the up movement.  Supposedly less rebound.
    | 
 
  |  | 
 
  | Alloy89   Newbie
 
   
 
 Joined: 23 Jun 2016
 Location: Texas
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 7
 |  Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 2:15pm | 
 
  | 
   Thanks for the feedback! What model do you guys use? Like I said my tow vehicle is a 2017 Santa Fe with a 3.3 engine rated to tow 5000 pounds.
    | 
 
  |  | 
 
  | CharlieM   Senior Member
 
   
   
 Joined: 23 Nov 2012
 Location: N. Colorado
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 1797
 |  Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 1:57pm | 
 
  | 
   
Both round and trunion provide WD and sway control. Trunion may have a bit more ground clearance, but neither is a problem. Round bar is a bit cheaper and entirely adequate.| Originally posted by M0tl3y 
 Round bar, to my understanding, is on WD hitches only. Whereas Trunnion bars are both WD and anti-sway.
 | 
 | 
 
  | 
     Charlie
Northern Colorado
 OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD
 PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD
 | 
 
  |  | 
 
  | M0tl3y   Groupie
 
   
   
 Joined: 21 Sep 2014
 Location: Utah
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 61
 |  Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 1:43pm | 
 
  | 
   Round bar, to my understanding, is on WD hitches only. Whereas Trunnion bars are both WD and anti-sway.
    | 
 
  | 
     The 178 club
     | 
 
  |  | 
 
  | TheBum   Senior Member
 
   
 
 Joined: 26 Feb 2016
 Location: Texas
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 1407
 |  Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 1:21pm | 
 
  | 
   As I understand it, a trunnion flexes less than a round bar. If the TV has a real frame, a trunnion might be better because the bars are further off the ground, so there's less chance of a scrape on the pavement when you hit a dip. If the TV is a unibody, the extra flex of the round bar may act as a shock absorber to help prevent damage to the body panels.
    | 
 
  |  | 
 
  | Alloy89   Newbie
 
   
 
 Joined: 23 Jun 2016
 Location: Texas
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 7
 |  Posted: 24 Jun 2016 at 12:26pm | 
 
  | 
   Hi all, I'm new to the forum and shopping for a RPod 172t and have a few questions on what's best for this camper, the e2 trunnion in or round bar weight distribution/sway system?  I will be towing with a 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe SE with the 3.3 engine. 
 Also are there any 172t owners out there and If so do you have any words of wisdom on this model?  Thanks in advance for the help, Tony | 
 
  |  |