R-pod Owners Forum : Subaru Outback 3.6

R-pod Owners Forum : Subaru Outback 3.6 http://www.rpod-owners.com/ This is an XML content feed of; R-pod Owners Forum : Introduce Yourself : Subaru Outback 3.6 Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 04 May 2026 11:26:41 +0000 Fri, 03 Jun 2016 07:22:21 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.64 360 www.rpod-owners.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=5619 R-pod Owners Forum http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png http://www.rpod-owners.com/ Subaru Outback 3.6 : Agreed, plus some states like... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76393#76393 Author: Leo B
Subject: 5619
Posted: 03 Jun 2016 at 7:22am

Agreed, plus some states like Vermont also have a clause in their inspection manual that also says that if the trailer has electric brakes, then the tow vehicles must have them not matter what the weight is.]]> Fri, 03 Jun 2016 07:22:21 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76393#76393 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Without functional trailer brakes,... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76392#76392 Author: ToolmanJohn
Subject: 5619
Posted: 03 Jun 2016 at 6:37am

Without functional trailer brakes, you tow vehicle is doing all the work of stopping both vehicles. It is also much more susceptible to a jack knife situation. Also, every state has laws concerning the max un-braked trailer weight, and most of those limits are near 1600 ponds. The R-Pod exceeds that my a wide margin. Get the trailer brake controller quick.]]> Fri, 03 Jun 2016 06:37:30 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76392#76392 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Originally posted by FreeRangePodI... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76387#76387 Author: furpod
Subject: 5619
Posted: 02 Jun 2016 at 10:37pm

Originally posted by FreeRangePod

I am using a 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee V8 with tow package. Doing well so far. I don't have a brake controller installed on the Jeep. Do you think I should?

Actually, by law, you must. Every state requires brakes on a 3500lb trailer, and every state requires the brakes to work.]]> Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:37:26 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76387#76387 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Originally posted by FreeRangePodI... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76374#76374 Author: Mountainrev
Subject: 5619
Posted: 02 Jun 2016 at 6:17pm

Originally posted by FreeRangePod

I am using a 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee V8 with tow package. Doing well so far. I don't have a brake controller installed on the Jeep. Do you think I should?

You may wish to start a new thread with your question, since you've tacked it on to the end of a rather old thread dealing with a different question. But here's my answer: Yes! You need a brake controller! Without a brake controller, your R-pod brakes are not functioning currently. That's not safe.

Be prepared, however, for a little bit of wiring and frustration. Even though your Grand Cherokee has the tow package, Chrysler didn't see fit to include a pre-wired receptacle for the brake controller. The tow package has the receiver hitch and the Bargmann 7-pin plug-in, and it's wired from the hitch to the dashboard, but that's it. You'll need to mount the brake controller, tap into the line from the hitch, tap into the brake lights, and then run a wire through the firewall and to your battery for power. I just did that a couple of months ago. It's not that hard, but a pain working under the dashboard.

Here's some good info on doing it: http://www.wkjeeps.com/trailer/electric_brake_inst_wk.jpg
]]> Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:17:02 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76374#76374 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Ditto! http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76372#76372 Author: Leo B
Subject: 5619
Posted: 02 Jun 2016 at 6:02pm

Ditto!]]> Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:02:26 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76372#76372 Subaru Outback 3.6 : I am using a 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76371#76371 Author: FreeRangePod
Subject: 5619
Posted: 02 Jun 2016 at 5:31pm

I am using a 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee V8 with tow package. Doing well so far. I don't have a brake controller installed on the Jeep. Do you think I should?]]> Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:31:50 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=76371#76371 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Originally posted by jeffleeWe... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54982#54982 Author: furpod
Subject: 5619
Posted: 14 Dec 2014 at 7:29pm

Originally posted by jefflee

We just purchased a RPOD 179 which weighs 2600 pounds. The Outback pulls 3,000 pounds. Is this vehicle acceptable or can someone please tell me a similar type SUV that would be better??

Thanks!

Not for a moment would I pull that setup. It's not just about weight.. Look in your owners manual about "frontal area" you pod has about 48 sqft of it..
]]> Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:29:52 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54982#54982 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Originally posted by jeffleeWe... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54980#54980 Author: ilmor
Subject: 5619
Posted: 14 Dec 2014 at 7:15pm

Thanks!

I would not do that. My plan, to pull and R 171 (a smaller trailer), is to obtain Jeep Grand Cherokee V8 or Diesel.

]]> Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:15:58 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54980#54980 Subaru Outback 3.6 : FR lists ship weight at 2630 pounds.... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54932#54932 Author: Keith-N-Dar
Subject: 5619
Posted: 13 Dec 2014 at 4:53pm

FR lists ship weight at 2630 pounds. when you add propane tank, battery, air conditioner, microwave and such you are over 3000. Add your gear and supplies and you are way over.

r
]]> Sat, 13 Dec 2014 16:53:14 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54932#54932 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Agreed, there is not enough "junk... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54929#54929 Author: Podster
Subject: 5619
Posted: 13 Dec 2014 at 12:34pm

Agreed, there is not enough "junk in the trunk" of the boo-boo-boo to tow the POD, comfortably. Smile

Some excess capacity is your friend when towing and makes things easier and a little safer.

Look for something with at least 125" length in wheel base minimum, longer is better. At least 5,000 lb tow capacity and get something that already has a tow package on it. That is, with a trans cooler, tow receiver, and a 7 pin connection would be awesome. Finally stick with something that has at least 225 hp minimum (give or take a few), 250+ hp is nice to have when pulling uphill on steep grades!

Good luck! Please come back and let up know how things work out!

]]> Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:34:32 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54929#54929 Subaru Outback 3.6 : I think Mountainrev is giving... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54917#54917 Author: dsmiths
Subject: 5619
Posted: 12 Dec 2014 at 9:31pm

I think Mountainrev is giving good advice. The Subie might be ok to move the pod around short distances and low speeds but not for the long haul. you need a longer wheelbase, bigger brakes and something with a frame. better safe than sorry.]]> Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:31:09 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54917#54917 Subaru Outback 3.6 : I started pulling my 151 with... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54915#54915 Author: sailo25
Subject: 5619
Posted: 12 Dec 2014 at 8:59pm

I started pulling my 151 with my 4 cyl Subaru and did not feel comfortable, weighs 2,100 empty mfr weight tag, 2,700 weight with water tanks empty after first trip]]> Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:59:24 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54915#54915 Subaru Outback 3.6 : My Opinion is no it is not acceptable.... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54904#54904 Author: Seanl
Subject: 5619
Posted: 12 Dec 2014 at 2:07pm

My Opinion is no it is not acceptable. You could probobly get away with a TV that could handle 3500lbs but that would be the absolute minimum in my opinion. You never want to tow right at your limit and you would be once you had the trailer loaded. ]]> Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:07:57 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54904#54904 Subaru Outback 3.6 : Hi, jefflee. You will get many... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54903#54903 Author: Mountainrev
Subject: 5619
Posted: 12 Dec 2014 at 1:59pm

Hi, jefflee. You will get many opinions about tow vehicles and what's safe and advisable, but I believe the general consensus on your Subaru is that it is not up to snuff for what you're asking of it. Remember that the 2,600 lbs you quote is the weight without things like battery, propane tanks, food, supplies (and probably not appliances like microwave, A/C, etc.). The actual weight of your 179 will likely be well over 3,000 lbs. This is not a safe set up, and will cause undo strain on your Subie.

You should probably looking at SUVs that are rated to tow at least 5,000 lbs, in my opinion. Outbacks really aren't SUVs--they're small (although capable) wagons. (By the way, I'm a Subie owner myself, but tow with a Dodge Durango).
]]> Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:59:39 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54903#54903 Subaru Outback 3.6 : We just purchased a RPOD 179 which... http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54902#54902 Author: jefflee
Subject: 5619
Posted: 12 Dec 2014 at 1:52pm

We just purchased a RPOD 179 which weighs 2600 pounds. The Outback pulls 3,000 pounds. Is this vehicle acceptable or can someone please tell me a similar type SUV that would be better??

Thanks!

]]> Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:52:40 +0000 http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=5619&PID=54902#54902