<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.com/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>R-pod Owners Forum : new tow vehicle question</title>
  <link>https://www.rpod-owners.com/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; R-pod Owners Forum : Reviews and General Information : new tow vehicle question</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.64</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.rpod-owners.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3350</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>new tow vehicle question : I think the 3.31 diff. should...</title>
   <link>https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31781#31781</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=428" rel="nofollow">David and Danette</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3350<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Mar 2013 at 10:35pm<br /><br />I think the 3.31 diff. should work fine. The rpod is not that big of a trailer. We have the 3.92 diff. only because we bought ours on the lot, we did not order it that way. If you do a lot of highway driving the 3.31 will give you better gas mileage, I mostly drive city and rural roads where the 3.92 does not make a big difference with the mpg. But if I get on interstate it does make a difference. You can tow a little more weight with a lower gear, but the rpod fully loaded to the max would never reach the limit of your tow capacity. Hope this helps in your decision. &nbsp; David]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31781#31781</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>new tow vehicle question :  Different manufacturers have...</title>
   <link>https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31779#31779</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=217" rel="nofollow">techntrek</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3350<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Mar 2013 at 9:36pm<br /><br /><p>Different manufacturers have slightly different axle ratios, but in general they are close to:</p><p>3.3-3.4, higher speeds possible, less torque at low speeds, best mpg</p><p>3.7, best middle-of-the-road gearing, better low-end torque but still decent mpg</p><p>4.1, best torque for heavy loads but worst mpg, very high rpms at highway speed</p><p>For the heavy duty towing vehicle you describe I would go with the 3.31 for use with the pod, it will only be about 3000 pounds when loaded. &nbsp;My Suburban is similar in specs with the heavy duty towing package, 6 speed tranny, 3.42 rear and I've never wished I had a different ratio. &nbsp;Very happy to get a little better mpg day to day.</p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31779#31779</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>new tow vehicle question : One of my clients has an Expedition...</title>
   <link>https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31777#31777</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=807" rel="nofollow">Keith-N-Dar</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3350<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Mar 2013 at 6:28pm<br /><br />One of my clients has an Expedition with the heavy duty trailer package.&nbsp; I don't know what ratio the axle is, but I do know that the rear springs are the same as an F250 pickup.&nbsp; It is stout!<br><br>It may depend on the year, but my F150, 2010, is 3.31 and with the 6 speed auto transmission it is low enough.&nbsp; I turn less than 2000 RPM at 65 and it pulls the pod like it isn't even there.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31777#31777</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>new tow vehicle question : we are trying to find a new tow...</title>
   <link>https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31774#31774</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=1008" rel="nofollow">Pod People</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3350<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Mar 2013 at 12:39pm<br /><br />we are trying to find a new tow vehicle-a Ford Expedition. I have found one with the heayy duty tow package but it has a 3.31 rear axle ratio instead of the 3.73 ratio. the tow&nbsp; package has a transmission cooler, a heavy duty radiator , the wire harness for brake controller and hitch.<br><br>We plan on taking the Rpod on long distance, cross country trips-eventually driving from NC to Calif and even to Alaska.<br><br>What do you think the difference in axle ratios really means?/ Is it power, torque, gas milage, longevity???<br><br>Should I continue to search for a TV that has the 3.73 axle or take the 3.31??<br><br>Thanks for any input.<br><br>Vann<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3350&amp;PID=31774#31774</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>