R-pod Owners Forum : Safety Recall https://www.rpod-owners.com/ This is an XML content feed of; R-pod Owners Forum : Warranty, Service and Recall Bulletins : Safety Recall Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 22 Jun 2026 11:49:28 +0000 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:22:34 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.64 360 https://www.rpod-owners.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2717 R-pod Owners Forum https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png https://www.rpod-owners.com/ Safety Recall : I've been considering an... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31103#31103 Author: techntrek
Subject: 2717
Posted: 26 Feb 2013 at 4:22pm

I've been considering an aftermarket adjustment for my truck since last year, but one thing that stopped me is my active warranty.  Didn't want to reprogram and end up with an issue they could trace back to it due to an invalid checksum.  Looks like that GF operates actively on the OBD-II so it isn't an actual reprogram.  Not all that expensive @ $69, either.  Hmmmmmm.....]]> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:22:34 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31103#31103 Safety Recall : Originally posted by BurtOK,... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31099#31099 Author: furpod
Subject: 2717
Posted: 26 Feb 2013 at 10:54am

Originally posted by Burt

OK, I give.  I'll see your two turbochargers and yet, my comment was rooted in the MPG column and what can be done by the average towvehicle without purchasing a new one.  My comment on the Eco Boost may have been out of the column.  Forgive me.

Burt


Nothing to forgive.. it's all good.

I am not, as of yet a fan of the eco-boost.. but EVERYONE I have met running one LOVES it.

My brain goes to.. "just think what it would have been like had they put dual spools on the new 6.2..???!!!"  I am a fan of forced induction. This household has been home to at least one power adder since 1979.

No doubt at all that on most cars and trucks today, some added gains are available with a tuner. manufacturers have to build to a set standard, the one the EPA approved, and have a "safe tune" so that engines don't grenade. And, once you start playing with a tuner, you find that each engine will have a different setting even if minor, that makes it happiest.

I have played with it a lot with my Mustang, and with her GTi.. I know about 20 v-dubs running hot tunes, and on a couple the mods and equipment are exactly the same, but there may be as much as 10% difference in where that particular pair of engines max out.

In our case she is putting about 235 to the flywheel in her GTi, with a factory tune that was set at about 198. (In her case, mileage didn't change one way or the other with the tune.. but I don't think it's the cars faultLOL) Nothing changed but the tune, and the fact that we run 93 octane only, allows us to bump it up pretty good, but much further, and a) the gains aren't worth the risk to the engine and transaxle, and.. with FWD, things get pretty hairy when you go above 230 or so anyways. Her next Golf will be a "R" or R32, I am sure. (AWD)
]]> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:54:35 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31099#31099 Safety Recall : OK, I give. I'll see your... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31092#31092 Author: Burt
Subject: 2717
Posted: 25 Feb 2013 at 6:10pm

OK, I give.  I'll see your two turbochargers and yet, my comment was rooted in the MPG column and what can be done by the average towvehicle without purchasing a new one.  My comment on the Eco Boost may have been out of the column.  Forgive me.

Burt
]]> Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:10:06 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31092#31092 Safety Recall : Originally posted by BurtSpoilers... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31087#31087 Author: furpod
Subject: 2717
Posted: 25 Feb 2013 at 2:37pm

Originally posted by Burt

Spoilers and MPG.  We're somewhat lucky as our RPod is a 2012 171 HRE and it came with a spoiler and all the "required" running lights.  BTW, they are all LED and really light up nice.

Our MPG was best improved by putting in a performance chip in my opinion.  That, and using non-ethanol fuel in the tow vehicle when towing.  You get more power out of a gallon that way.  We have a Ford Ranger V6, 3.0 Liter FWD and are now getting 2 to 4 MPG better when towing with just a few runs tested.  The vehicle itself now gets 4 to 5 MPG better non towing and in town/out of town.  Over the road, there is a marked improvement in mileage without tow.

The chip we decided on was made by GF.  Most of the big diesel tow rigs that tow are now using performance chips and I seriously believe that the ford "Eco Boost," is not much more than an added performance chip.

Performance chips of the right type do not just dump fuel into your engine, they work WITH all the OEM components of an engine, viz., exhausts, vacuums, fuel input, computer and etc.  Thus, they can cause your tow vehicle to achieve better results and have more ooomph on the hills.

There's my 2 bits worth.

Burt


Well.. that and two turbochargers..
]]> Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:37:24 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31087#31087 Safety Recall : Spoilers and MPG. We're somewhat... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31085#31085 Author: Burt
Subject: 2717
Posted: 25 Feb 2013 at 2:12pm

Spoilers and MPG.  We're somewhat lucky as our RPod is a 2012 171 HRE and it came with a spoiler and all the "required" running lights.  BTW, they are all LED and really light up nice.

Our MPG was best improved by putting in a performance chip in my opinion.  That, and using non-ethanol fuel in the tow vehicle when towing.  You get more power out of a gallon that way.  We have a Ford Ranger V6, 3.0 Liter FWD and are now getting 2 to 4 MPG better when towing with just a few runs tested.  The vehicle itself now gets 4 to 5 MPG better non towing and in town/out of town.  Over the road, there is a marked improvement in mileage without tow.

The chip we decided on was made by GF.  Most of the big diesel tow rigs that tow are now using performance chips and I seriously believe that the ford "Eco Boost," is not much more than an added performance chip.

Performance chips of the right type do not just dump fuel into your engine, they work WITH all the OEM components of an engine, viz., exhausts, vacuums, fuel input, computer and etc.  Thus, they can cause your tow vehicle to achieve better results and have more ooomph on the hills.

There's my 2 bits worth.

Burt
]]> Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:12:31 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31085#31085 Safety Recall : I must now report that my frustration... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31083#31083 Author: aatonna
Subject: 2717
Posted: 25 Feb 2013 at 1:28pm

I must now report that my frustration over the fact that the new spoiler did not gain noticible gas mileage improvement, took me back to my dealer.  I traded my R-Pod for a Lance 1575.  It's a foot or so longer, wider and weighs a couple hundred pounds more.  I took an initial trip this weekend and at 58 MPH with steady cross winds much of the 130 mile trip, I got 13.3 mpg, an improvement over the 9-10 mpg with the R-Pod.  The box versus tear-drop design makes a big difference!  I'm using the same 2011 Honda Ridgeline tow vehicle.]]> Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:28:57 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=31083#31083 Safety Recall : I find it curious that many assume... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30228#30228 Author: barbanjoe
Subject: 2717
Posted: 12 Jan 2013 at 10:43pm

I find it curious that many assume it to be a spoiler, it is the shape it is because of the lights have to be visible from behind, the pod is round thus the shape.]]> Sat, 12 Jan 2013 22:43:45 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30228#30228 Safety Recall : As posted before the largest... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30217#30217 Author: Keith-N-Dar
Subject: 2717
Posted: 12 Jan 2013 at 2:54pm

As posted before the largest impact on my mileage is my behavior.  If I have to travel at 75 then I get 10 MPG.  If I keep it under 60 then I get 15 or 16 MPG.  I had the spoiler from the start so I can't compare.  I can't imagine that little wing that is under the air flow to help.]]> Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:54:05 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30217#30217 Safety Recall : I've only towed 4 trips... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30215#30215 Author: Kickstart
Subject: 2717
Posted: 12 Jan 2013 at 1:29pm

I've only towed 4 trips since the install of the wing, but every one has been a common tow that I've done in the past, and each one has been hand figured for mpg, as always. Every trip has shown an increase in mileage over the averages from former trips. My wing trips have all been with winter blend gas, which never does anyone any good for mileage.
 
I'll figure mileage this coming camping season, and try to remember to post the results. I'll then eat my crow or have some more info on whether it has helped my mpg overall. We have 3 or 4 common trips that we take of 150 to 300 miles. These are the ones I'll use to compare pre/post wing mpg.  I'm hoping my tow combo is at a sweet spot for improved mileage. I do hand figure, and don't depend on an onboard display. I do use a Scangauge to monitor current mileage and engine performance. No, I'm not seeing that 5 mpg increase, but even maintaining my small gains would be nice with the current gas prices.
 
 
]]> Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:29:24 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30215#30215 Safety Recall : Point well taken. I saw your test... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30211#30211 Author: aatonna
Subject: 2717
Posted: 12 Jan 2013 at 11:49am

Point well taken.  I saw your test results and the graphics helped me understand the counter-intuitive drag effect.  The untrained, as I was, would assume R-Pod's the shape to result in nothing but low drag.  Not so.  When I began my trek out of Phoenix I was getting nearly 15 mpg and was elated at the prospect that that would be the new norm.  Not so, as I experienced the full driving mix you referred to: headwinds, hills, mountains, rougher pavement.  We were back to 9-10 mpg as before. Too bad a solution isn't out there b/c the R-Pod is the best bang for the buck (and weight).  We have even considered a trade but can't find a comparable light weight and we would never recoup in gas savings what we would spend on the trade.  Tongue
]]> Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:49:38 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30211#30211 Safety Recall : I was wondering about the comments... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30209#30209 Author: tsunami123
Subject: 2717
Posted: 12 Jan 2013 at 11:26am

I was wondering about the comments of increased mpg after spoiler installation.  A couple of years ago, I and another member ran some aerodynamic simulations and didn't find any real improvement in airflow using small spoilers on the back of the Pod.
This is where anecdotal information falls apart...single incidents may not be valid overall.  Installing the spoiler may cause you to slow down for increased mpg. Or the first trip you take afterward may have few headwinds or few hills and valleys.  You need to travel quite a few miles under many varying conditions to validate the increase in mpg with the new spoilers.
For example, my niece will not have her kids vaccinated for the flu because a relative had an adverse reaction to the shot.  Now she believes that anyone who gets the shot will come down with an allergic reaction.  And no evidence to the contrary will convince her that it is better to get the shot!
While visiting my local FR Pod dealer, I encountered another Pod owner who recently had the spoiler installed.  He insisted that his mpg had increased from 10 to 15 mpg because of the spoiler.  The dealer had never heard about such an increase in mpg from anyone else.  After the other owner left, we both agreed that the spoiler had little if anything to do with his increased mileage.
]]> Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:26:31 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30209#30209 Safety Recall : I began this post last June. Until... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30208#30208 Author: aatonna
Subject: 2717
Posted: 11 Jan 2013 at 11:39pm

I began this post last June. Until last week (January 2013) and after the new light bar was installed, I had not take a long enough trip to judge whether I got any better mileage with my tow vehicle (2011 Honda Ridgeline).  Now after retuning from a week at Death Valley, CA (1300 miles with touring miles) I can report that any mileage improvement was negligible, if any.  I ran no more than 57 mph the whole trip.  There was freeway driving mixed with hills and mountains.  I had high hopes, but now I have to be satisfied with the overall comfort and versatility of my R-Pod without illusions that mpg can improve. 

BTW  I highly recommend the beauty of Death Valley in any season but Summer.  You will experience the extremes of 282 feet below sea level to 11,000 foot snow capped mountains and you can drive at least to 6,000 feet above sea level.  Great beauty; great trip.
]]> Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:39:29 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=30208#30208 Safety Recall : Couple posts back, I compared... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28942#28942 Author: Kickstart
Subject: 2717
Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 6:08pm

Couple posts back, I compared my towing mpg with and without the recall installed wing. I noticed a marked improvement with the wing. Well, now I'm a real believer. We took a trip to my wife's favorite campground (Cape Disappointment in WA state). We've gone there many times, and, as always, I hand figured our towing mileage. This is a moderate tow over lots of up and down foothills (Willapa Hills). Previously the worst and best trip mileage for this trip with this truck have been 10.1 and 11.5 mpg. This trip we got 12.7 and the conditions were not optimal for towing--rain and head and side winds--very comparable to the time we got 10.1 mpg. For my towing combo, I think the wing really does improve my mileage.
 
I know lots of you have noticed no mileage difference after the install of the wing. For some that could be because your tow rig may be taxed enough towing your Pod that the slight gains enabled by the wing just aren't enough. I'm lucky enough to have a truck that can tow 8000 lbs., and towing at 200 rpms or so less do appear to make a difference.
]]> Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:08:22 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28942#28942 Safety Recall : Interesting. https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28268#28268 Author: techntrek
Subject: 2717
Posted: 04 Oct 2012 at 2:41pm

Interesting.]]> Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:41:33 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28268#28268 Safety Recall : Well, I got the recall done... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28264#28264 Author: Kickstart
Subject: 2717
Posted: 04 Oct 2012 at 11:53am

Well, I got the recall done yesterday-6 hours towing with 5 hours to install. Long day. It looks like I'm gonna be one that the spoiler helps with mileage. The route to my dealer is a common tow for me that I've always checked mileage and monitored engine performance with my ScanGauge. Yesterday I got 11.0 towing there and 14.1 towing home. My best previous mileage was 13.1 on this route. These are all hand figured.
Also the ScanGauge indicated that my transmission temperature was 10 degrees cooler pulling the toughest grade coming home. The engine pulled this grade about 200 RPMs less than usual, and the transmission did not search as much. I didn't feel the need to manually downshift, which is not common. All of these things indicate that the wing does help lessen wind drag, and helps 55 to 60 mph be my towing sweet spot with this truck. ]]> Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:53:55 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28264#28264 Safety Recall : My dealer has had my retrofit... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28114#28114 Author: HuronSailor
Subject: 2717
Posted: 29 Sep 2012 at 10:33am

My dealer has had my retrofit kit since mid August. In fact they ordered kits for every pod they sold that was subject to recall. Problem is they didn't bother to tell me, and I've been trying to make arrangements with a dealer much closer since the first of July. 

Susan has about 2400 affected owners, and if the dealers would just communicate with their customers by simply returning their phone calls, her job would be so much easier.
]]> Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:33:47 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28114#28114 Safety Recall : Susan got back to me, the... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28108#28108 Author: Kickstart
Subject: 2717
Posted: 29 Sep 2012 at 1:22am

Susan got back to me, the materials have been delivered, and appointment set for 10/3. Progress is being made after 3 months of inquiries. Now to sweat out the install. ]]> Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:22:21 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=28108#28108 Safety Recall : Hey HS, I'm right there... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27808#27808 Author: Kickstart
Subject: 2717
Posted: 15 Sep 2012 at 12:17pm

Hey HS, I'm right there with you. I have called my dealer a few times over the last 2 months, and they put the lack of materials  off on Forest River. E/mailed Susan and I haven't heard from her either. Winter is coming and I don't want to have to tow the 150 miles to my dealer in poor weather. ]]> Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:17:43 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27808#27808 Safety Recall : We seem to have hit a wall as... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27803#27803 Author: HuronSailor
Subject: 2717
Posted: 15 Sep 2012 at 10:36am

We seem to have hit a wall as far as our recall goes. When we originally called the dealer they seemed positively giddy with the prospect of our coming in to have the work done, took our VIN and said they would get parts posthaste. It was understood we'd be in after Labor Day. Called them twice since Labor Day to set up an appointment, the last time on 9/5, and they've not bothered to return either call. 

Any dealers in MI online who want the job?
]]> Sat, 15 Sep 2012 10:36:03 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27803#27803 Safety Recall : In case anyone is wondering, the... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27670#27670 Author: g4royce
Subject: 2717
Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 8:26pm

In case anyone is wondering, the lightbar did not affect our mpg on our trip tp Cape Cod this past weekend.  We didn't think it would since it was so small.]]> Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:26:24 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27670#27670 Safety Recall : Yes it is very tight and a clean... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27472#27472 Author: sfish
Subject: 2717
Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 11:11pm

Yes it is very tight and a clean install. It looks like it was always there.]]> Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:11:27 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27472#27472 Safety Recall : Is your lightbar totally tight... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27465#27465 Author: kozyinn
Subject: 2717
Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 8:46pm

Is your lightbar totally tight to the camper all the way across? Ours has a gap in the middle and the company did not respond to our question about the gap.]]> Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:46:28 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27465#27465 Safety Recall : Finally got my letter after 2... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27461#27461 Author: dsmiths
Subject: 2717
Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 8:32pm

Finally got my letter after 2 or 3 calls and emails to Forest River, Susan was very helpful, an r v dealer that is much closer to me than the selling dealer took my information and is going to order the parts and take care of it for us. Now that is service, they will be getting any future business from me, I like problem solvers not problem makers.]]> Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:32:21 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27461#27461 Safety Recall : I picked up the pod yesterday... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27441#27441 Author: sfish
Subject: 2717
Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 9:23am

I picked up the pod yesterday after having the recall done.They did a great job at Bullyans Rv putting the lights on. I also had them install the axel risers as long as it was there.It looks taller and safer with the lights on. Thanks Forest River.

]]> Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:23:40 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27441#27441 Safety Recall : I got my recall letter today after... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27429#27429 Author: dsmiths
Subject: 2717
Posted: 04 Sep 2012 at 9:36pm

I got my recall letter today after contacting Forest River about 4 times during ordering a part, after i talked to Susan in Northern Indiana everything was alright.]]> Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:36:55 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=27429#27429 Safety Recall : Look for a switch on the water... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26930#26930 Author: techntrek
Subject: 2717
Posted: 19 Aug 2012 at 4:31pm

Look for a switch on the water heater itself in the lower-left corner.  While the gas on/off is mounted inside, the AC on/off is on the heater (some have moved the wiring inside and put a switch next to the gas switch).]]> Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:31:38 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26930#26930 Safety Recall : Thanks for the tip. I'll... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26920#26920 Author: aatonna
Subject: 2717
Posted: 19 Aug 2012 at 12:54am

Thanks for the tip.  I'll make sure the refrigerator is on gas when I power up the generator.  I don't think the water heater in mine has a 110 option and always heats with gas.  I had the impression that the extra load that tripped the generator's breaker was the power unit/switch box that was charging the batteries.  I'll experiment because, as in your case, the generator ought to do fine under the full load.]]> Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:54:56 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26920#26920 Safety Recall : Originally posted by aatonna ... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26917#26917 Author: Seanl
Subject: 2717
Posted: 18 Aug 2012 at 11:11pm

Originally posted by aatonna

I started this string on June 29.  Now I have the finalchapter.  The company did send the parts directly to me (my dealer refuseto receive them directly).  The work wasdone in one day and seems well installed. I think I have noticed a 1 mpg improvement but need a truer test on alonger haul.  I am reconciled to the factthat there is no proven fix to the design drag properties of the R-Pod, so I’llmove on and continue to thoroughly enjoy it. I did buy a 3200/5000 watt generator for power when needed in unimprovedareas.  It worked well without the AC onand would trip the 26 amp fuse when AC was turned on.  I shut off the breakers for temporarily unneededaccessories, and the generator ran the AC fine. Minor disappointment!  Thumbs Up


My Generator is a 3000/4000 watt and it runs everything in the pod fine. I Almost stalled the Generator when I once when the AC compressor kicked in  and the convection oven was on but I did not trip the breaker. I do run the fridge and the water heater on gas when I am using the generator. 
]]> Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:11:52 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26917#26917 Safety Recall : Normal 0 ... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26909#26909 Author: aatonna
Subject: 2717
Posted: 18 Aug 2012 at 1:25pm

I started this string on June 29.  Now I have the finalchapter.  The company did send the parts directly to me (my dealer refuseto receive them directly).  The work wasdone in one day and seems well installed. I think I have noticed a 1 mpg improvement but need a truer test on alonger haul.  I am reconciled to the factthat there is no proven fix to the design drag properties of the R-Pod, so I’llmove on and continue to thoroughly enjoy it. I did buy a 3200/5000 watt generator for power when needed in unimprovedareas.  It worked well without the AC onand would trip the 26 amp fuse when AC was turned on.  I shut off the breakers for temporarily unneededaccessories, and the generator ran the AC fine. Minor disappointment!  Thumbs Up

]]> Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:25:00 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26909#26909 Safety Recall : It takes about 2 1/2 hrs to install... https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26907#26907 Author: TIDALWAVE
Subject: 2717
Posted: 18 Aug 2012 at 9:51am

It takes about 2 1/2 hrs to install the spoiler and fender lights if the technician has previously installed a unit.  My dealer had me in at 8AM and out by noon and did a very good, clean job.]]> Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:51:15 +0000 https://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717&PID=26907#26907