<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.com/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>R-pod Owners Forum : Input/Advice</title>
  <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; R-pod Owners Forum : Introduce Yourself : Input/Advice</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.64</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.rpod-owners.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1667</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>Input/Advice : You can put a class III on, it...</title>
   <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14295#14295</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=217" rel="nofollow">techntrek</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1667<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28 Mar 2011 at 9:24am<br /><br />You can put a class III on, it still has a 2" draw bar.&nbsp; <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>If you are willing to install it yourself you can get a WDH for around $450.&nbsp; It isn't hard to install, just very time consuming as you have to readjust several times to get it right.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14295#14295</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Input/Advice : Thanks so much for your comments!...</title>
   <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14283#14283</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=795" rel="nofollow">Yankee</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1667<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Mar 2011 at 7:22pm<br /><br />Thanks so much for your comments! Our "cargo" would consist of personal/household items as well as TV, microwave, propane, batteries and water (all colors) and we were planning to stay under the 3,500 pound limit.&nbsp; We were hoping to take several trips to "gunkhole" our way across Canada and the States on mainly backroads so speed is not an issue but certainly safely is!&nbsp; It looks like synthetic transmission fluid, a transmission cooler, weight distribution and a Class III trailer hitch (thought because of the 3,500 pounds towing capacity of the Escape that we are limited to a Class II hitch?) that we might be able to overcome some of the concerns but your last paragraph really makes us stop and re-think our plan. <br><br>We will cautiously proceed, in light of your comments, but I suspect we will probably reach the same conclusions you have!<br><br>Many thanks for taking the time to respond!<br><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14283#14283</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Input/Advice : I second the recommendation of...</title>
   <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14248#14248</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=217" rel="nofollow">techntrek</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1667<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Mar 2011 at 12:44pm<br /><br />I second the recommendation of getting a weight distribution hitch. &nbsp;Ignoring the handling and safety benefits, it just makes the ride going down the road much more comfortable.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14248#14248</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Input/Advice : Deffenetly a tranny cooler. I...</title>
   <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14245#14245</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=733" rel="nofollow">Pawpod</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1667<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 Mar 2011 at 12:40am<br /><br />Deffenetly a tranny cooler. I had one vehicle that I had to replace the tranny in. The transmission  shop told me the tranny was burnt out from pulling a trailer. Interesting since we had no trailer and only owned the car for 6 months. Don't take long to burn one out as I learned from multiple sources. For $300 compared to $3500 for a new tranny, cheap!<br /><br />And IMO yes, go class III for a hitch. Cost is very close, and the 2 inch receiver is better for a hidden hitch. Usually easier to remove if it rusts a bit]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14245#14245</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Input/Advice : Yankee, I&amp;#039;m currently pulling...</title>
   <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14244#14244</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=703" rel="nofollow">iamsmonk</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1667<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Mar 2011 at 10:56pm<br /><br /><P>Yankee,</P><DIV>I'm currently pulling my RP-177 with a 1998 Ford Ranger Super Cab.&nbsp; 2 wheel drive, 5 speed manual transmission, 4.0 V6 engine with 245,000 miles on it.&nbsp; I'm&nbsp; pulling the pod in the piedmont and foothills of the North Carolina mountains.&nbsp; I do not carry water in any of the tanks.&nbsp; I have one battery and one propane tank.&nbsp; My truck does fine.&nbsp; Would I like to have more power? Sure, who wouldn't. But a larger tow vehicle is not in my budget at this time.&nbsp; I have been doing research on a new tow vehicle and notice that the new Rangers have more torque and more horsepower than my 1998 has and when I do upgrade, I will most likely get another Ranger.&nbsp; I LOVE my truck and it has been a good one.&nbsp; But until the economy improves and my work hours increase my current truck will do just fine.&nbsp; I don't pull the pod very far.&nbsp; My closest campground is 30 minutes away and the farthest is 2 hours.&nbsp; </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I hope this helps you a bit.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Happy podding!</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14244#14244</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Input/Advice : I have a 2008 Mazda Tribute with...</title>
   <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14243#14243</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=418" rel="nofollow">Outbound</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1667<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Mar 2011 at 6:30pm<br /><br />I have a 2008 Mazda Tribute with factory tow package, which I'm sure that you know is a rebadged Ford Escape. &nbsp;Mine has the 3 litre engine producing 200 HP, which is 40 HP less than yours. &nbsp;I also have a four speed transmission with overdrive-lockout vs your six-speed tranny.<div><br></div><div>To&nbsp;accommodate&nbsp;trailering, I've replaced the transmission fluid with full synthetic as advised in the owner's manual (about a $120 cost for fluid plus 30 minutes labour for a flush). &nbsp;I've also added an aftermarket transmission cooler (very reasonably priced at $80 for parts plus an hour's labour), which makes quite a difference during long, hot hauls.</div><div><br></div><div>The RP-177 has a beefier 4" frame to&nbsp;accommodate&nbsp;the slideout, compared to the RP-171's 3" frame. &nbsp;So, yes, it is capable of handling more weight. &nbsp;I'm not sure what type of cargo you're talking about carrying in your trailer. &nbsp;We've got just under 300 pounds of gear that we carry, in addition to the A/C, microwave, battery and propane that aren't included in the trailer's dry weight.</div><div><br></div><div>Speaking about calculating weights, don't forget about fresh water &amp; waste water. &nbsp;We usually run with 10-20 US gallons of fresh water in the tank. &nbsp;Although many people drain their fresh tank before heading on the road, we find carrying a bit of water very convenient for washing dishes after a picnic stop while travelling, simply using the loo, or showering after stopping at a beach. &nbsp;And there are times when its necessary to travel with 10-15 US gallons of black water because a campground didn't have a dumpstation (e.g.&nbsp;dispersed&nbsp;camping/boondocking), or because we stayed didn't stay at a campground at all (e.g. WalMart, family's/friends' driveways, open field during a concert/event). &nbsp;I like to have at least 300 pounds of leeway for water &amp; waste on these occasions.</div><div><br></div><div>Tongue weight was a major concern when I purchased our 2009 RP-171. &nbsp;The dry tongue weight on an RP-171 is 181 pounds - fully loaded ours comes in at 225 pounds. &nbsp;The RP-177's dry tongue weight is 232 pounds. &nbsp;By the time you load up the trailer and add a battery and propane, it'll be topping 260 pounds. &nbsp;I know that the Tribute/Escape lists the tongue weight at 350 pounds, but you also have to give some consideration to weight you're carrying in the back of the vehicle. &nbsp;IMHO, you will likely need weight distribution if you choose an RP-177; this means you'll also need to install a class III hitch in order to support the WDH. &nbsp;I do have a friction sway bar installed on my trailer and class II drawbar.</div><div><br></div><div>But, the proof is in the pudding as granny used to say. &nbsp;We travel at 55 MPH, but are able to speed up to 65-70 for passing. &nbsp;Anything above 55 MPH is clearly working the engine/transmission and makes me feel&nbsp;uncomfortable. &nbsp;Gas mileage is in the 10-12 MPG range, which seems to be typical with other r-pod owners and their various vehicles.</div><div><br></div><div>However, with all that positive stuff I've said above, I've always maintained that <u>I don't recommend towing an r-pod with a Tribute/Escape</u>. &nbsp;Its just too underpowered. &nbsp;The vehicle's performance is just barely acceptable while towing an r-pod at 55 MPH. &nbsp;A vehicle with a 5000 pound tow rating would be much more appropriate for an r-pod.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14243#14243</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Input/Advice : We own a 2010 Ford Escape with...</title>
   <link>http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14242#14242</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.rpod-owners.com/member_profile.asp?PF=795" rel="nofollow">Yankee</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1667<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Mar 2011 at 5:40pm<br /><br />We own a 2010 Ford Escape with the larger engine and tires and we are looking at towing an r-pod.&nbsp; We really like the RP-177 and it has been pointed out to us that by limiting the GVRW of the RP-177 to the 3500 pounds our car can tow, we would get a trailer with greater cargo carrying capacity than the RP-171 and we would probably have a safer haul because the trailer wouldn't be loaded to capacity and it may also have improved axle or tires to accommodate the difference in weight and length over the RP-171. &nbsp; (The RP-171 has a cargo capacity of 1070 and the RP-177 has a cargo capacity of 1447 if loaded to it's full GVRW.&nbsp; If only loaded to 3500 pounds, the RP-177 would give a cargo capacity of 1215 pounds - that 145 pounds more than the RP-171.)<br><br>We would appreciate the input/advice of anyone who tows a RP-177 with a Ford Escape or the opinions of anyone who thinks we are barking up the wrong tree.&nbsp; Our biggest concer is whether the Escape is up to towing either the RP-171 or the RP-177.<br><br>We do not yet have our tow package installed so would appreciate any recommendations in that department as well!<br><br>Thanks and happy camping - we're jealous!<br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1667&amp;PID=14242#14242</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>