R-pod 172 frame size
Printed From: R-pod Owners Forum
Category: R-pod Discussion Forums
Forum Name: Reviews and General Information
Forum Discription: Find r-pod reviews and new product announcements here
URL: http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=7466
Printed Date: 20 Jun 2025 at 3:25am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.64 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: R-pod 172 frame size
Posted By: timpod
Subject: R-pod 172 frame size
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2016 at 11:44am
|
I was wondering if anybody has information on the 172 frame size change. I was on a dealer lot yesterday and noticed that an earlier 2010 model year had 2x3" steel framing, while the newer 2016 has 3x4" framing. Scouring through online photos it seems like this is a recent change for the 172 (and possibly 171). Anything earlier than 2016 look like they have 2x3 frames. Though I noticed that other models, such as the 181, etc., have had 3x4 framing for a while. Maybe since they were introduced. I thought it might have something to do with the Hood River Edition, but I've seen plenty of pictures of earlier Hoods with 2x3" frames. |
Replies:
Posted By: David and Danette
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2016 at 1:27pm
|
I used to think when we had our 171 that the frame could be a little stronger when at times it would have a little bow to it in the tongue area. I thought about it and decided the engineers who designed the frame thought that it would be strong enough. Never heard of a frame breaking on the r-pods, why they would make the change is a good question. ------------- 2018 Vista Cruiser 19BFD (2018- 2012 Vibe 6503 (2014-2019) 2009 r-pod 171 (2009-2014) Middle Tn 2014 Ram 1500 Quad cab |
Posted By: timpod
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2016 at 4:25pm
| Looking at more online photos, it appears the 2015 year 172 has the 3x4" framing. After thinking about it some more, I believe that the original rpods all had 2x3 framing. The 2x4 was introduced when they added the sliders models, which are heavier and required stiffer framing. At first the different models had different frames, but the move to upgrade the 171/172 is probably just to simplify their assembly line, so all rpods use the same sub-frame. Anyway, that's my guess. I emailed forest river about it, thought not expecting a detailed reply to what is probably just an internal production optimization. |
Posted By: techntrek
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2016 at 4:39pm
|
Welcome. Interesting info. I'm sure you are right it was to unify the production line. ------------- Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1723 - Pod instruction manual 
|
Posted By: marwayne
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2016 at 9:41pm
|
Just FYI, I was at the Goshen Rally last year and found out from the Dexter Rep that my 2011 172 had a 3000# axle not 3500# ------------- If you want something done right, do it yourself. 2011 RP172, 2016 Tundra 5.7 Litre, Ltd. |
Posted By: timpod
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2016 at 11:04pm
| I compared the axles of the 2010 vs the 2016 model 172, since they were right next to each other... and the 2010 axle was definitely smaller. |
Posted By: marwayne
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2016 at 11:59pm
|
They replaced the 3000# Dexter axle with a 3500# Lippert axle free of charge at the Goshen Rally. ------------- If you want something done right, do it yourself. 2011 RP172, 2016 Tundra 5.7 Litre, Ltd. |
Posted By: timpod
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2016 at 10:22am
| Here is the official reply from Forest River to my inquiry about the frame change: "we always make changes to improve product". |
Posted By: techntrek
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2016 at 7:52pm
|
...and their bottom line. ------------- Doug ~ '10 171 (2009-2015) ~ 2008 Salem ~ http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1723 - Pod instruction manual
|