Print Page | Close Window

New Member

Printed From: R-pod Owners Forum
Category: R-pod Discussion Forums
Forum Name: Introduce Yourself
Forum Discription: New Members - tell us about yourself and your r-pod
URL: http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=12961
Printed Date: 03 May 2024 at 8:26am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.64 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: New Member
Posted By: PFinney
Subject: New Member
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 9:44am
Hi all.New to forum.I have been researching the R Pod for several mo.now.Recently visited Couch's RV.I got a quote on a 178 of $16.1.Question is can I tow this with a chevy Equinox-v6 witth tow capacity of 3500 lbs? Wt.of 178 is 2603.Hitch wt.165.My husband and I have never towed before so I am seeking advice? Couch's will use blu ox wt.dist.hitch.



Replies:
Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 10:50am
Welcome!

Hitch weight empty of the 178 is 268 lbs. You never want to tow with a hitch weight less than 10% of the total trailer weight, that can result in sway.

The problem you're facing is that that unloaded trailer weight of 2600 lbs is very misleading to new owners. That number includes no options, batteries, water, gear, or supplies. In reality you will be very near, at, or over 3500 lbs once you load that trailer. And over 350 on the tongue weight.

On the tow vehicle side, the 3500 lb rating generally assumes nothing in the vehicle except one skinny driver. 

So, can you do it with your Equinox? Most folks would probably say not safely, and that you should have a minimum 5000 lb tow rated vehicle to tow an rPod. That would be my recommendation. 

There is another thread active on the forum right now you can read for more detail. Topic is dry weight.

Good luck!


-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: podwerkz
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 11:21am
Welcome, and Wow...16 dollars is a better deal than I got!

Tongue

Yeah a vehicle with a 3500 pound tow rating is not recommended, and could be unsafe. You need a smaller trailer or a larger tow vehicle.

Hitch weight on these trailers with propane, battery, and a lot of your stuff in the front of the trailer brings the tongue weight up around 350 to 500 pounds or so.

Total loaded weight ready-to-roll will be around 3000-3500 pounds, leaving you with no room for error.




-------------
r・pod 171 gone but not forgotten!


Posted By: PFinney
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 11:50am
Thanks for the info.I knew this was the place to come to for realistic answers.We have a silverado.It is older but I know we can tow with it.


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 11:54am
If you like SUV's, with such a great deal on your rPod, why not trade your Equinox "compact" SUV for a "midsize" SUV like the Traverse/Highlander/Santa Fe/Explorer? 

Get something with factory tow package with a min 5000 lb trailer/500 tongue rating, AWD (NOT FWD), and at least an 18-20 gal fuel tank so you're not having to stop to refuel every 100 miles. You will be getting 13-14 mpg no matter what you're towing the trailer with. 


-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: PFinney
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 12:19pm
Figure I will use the silverado.Won't part with the Equinox.Might step up to 179 or 180 r pod if I use the truck.Still checking out options.R pod offers so much in a small package.This forum is great.I have been following it for a while.I am in ohio so not many options for r pods.They leave the lots quickly.


Posted By: offgrid
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 1:13pm
The difference in weight between the bigger rpods is not that significant, so get what you like. Except the 195, that is a much larger trailer. 

-------------
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold


Posted By: podwerkz
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 1:44pm
The Silverado should have no problem pulling (and stopping) the r-pod, and of course the assumption is made that you have a brake controller in that pickup.

Also, after you take delivery, take the trailer on a short trip for two or three days at a local campground, and check out everything, make sure it all works, figure out what you need and don't need.

Then you will be much more comfortable and prepared when you take a longer trip for a week or two. 


-------------
r・pod 171 gone but not forgotten!


Posted By: lostagain
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 4:54pm
Welcome to the forum and best of luck with your new purchase.

-------------
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 18 Jun 2019 at 6:00pm
+1 (or 2). Offgrid & Podwerks are spot on with the vehicle capability. 5000 lbs is a good starting point for all of the larger R-pods (excepting the 195; it will need a little more).

-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: PFinney
Date Posted: 19 Jun 2019 at 7:53am
Great advice.Thanks for the response.


Posted By: mcarter
Date Posted: 19 Jun 2019 at 8:05am
I have towed my 178 with 2 Silverados, both 1/2 tons and a Colorado, brake controller and sway device, no issues.

-------------
Mike Carter
2015 178
" I had the right to remain silent, I just didn't have the ability."


Posted By: crw8sr
Date Posted: 19 Jun 2019 at 9:49pm
Welcome to the forum.  

Having towed with a vehicle rated 3500 lbs I can tell you it's no fun.  Any rain, snow, wind, etc. it's scary!  (Not to mention unsafe at any speed.)


-------------
Chuck & Lyn
Izzy, Morkie. RIP
Zoe Joy & Gracie, Yorkie
2018 R Pod 190   
2019 Traverse

In moments of adversity;when life's a total wreck, I think of those worse off than me and really feel like heck.


Posted By: StephenH
Date Posted: 19 Jun 2019 at 10:07pm
I towed with a 2016 Ford Escape SE with the 2L Ecoboost engine and the factory tow package. It was rated at 3500 lbs. It towed okay. The short distance between the center of the rear axle and the hitch ball meant that it was pretty stable with an Equal-i-zer hitch. What did us in was hitting ice with a strong cross-wind. When you are towing a big sail, sometimes all you can do is go along for the ride. The biggest down side was that the Escape was front-wheel drive only. That meant that it would not have been possible to tow without the WD hitch as the front of the Escape would have too little weight on the tires for effective steering. As it was, traction was less than ideal, meaning I could spin the front tires if I were too aggressive taking off. I avoided dirt roads knowing traction would have been a problem, especially if I needed to go from stopped to moving on a hill. AWD or 4WD would have been much better.

Now we tow with a 2010 Nissan Frontier LE Crew Cab which is 4WD. The increased distance between the axle center line and the hitch ball meant the trailer could exert more force on the truck. I felt the RPod more when wind gusts hit. That is, until I bought the Hensley Swift Cub hitch I am now using That and the Hayes Sway-Master electronic sway control are my assurance that I am very, very much less likely to encounter a situation like we had with the ice and wind. The Frontier is rated for 6,100 lbs but when it comes down to it, the 2L Ecoboost engine in the Escape coupled with the better gearing in the transmission meant that at any significant altitude, the Escape had more power than the naturally aspirated Frontier. The mileage I get with the Frontier isn't as good as what I got with the Escape, but the much larger gas tank means that my range is much farther.

I would not mind upgrading to an F150 with the Diesel engine, but the price is way beyond our budget. I'm comfortable with the Frontier. I could live with the F150, but the bigger trucks are too big for us and too expensive to purchase.


-------------
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,...

http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=7712 - ouR escaPOD mods
Former RPod 179
Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 20 Jun 2019 at 9:57am
Originally posted by StephenH

I would not mind upgrading to an F150 with the Diesel engine, but the price is way beyond our budget. I'm comfortable with the Frontier. I could live with the F150, but the bigger trucks are too big for us and too expensive to purchase.
The newer generation F-150 does not need that diesel. You would have more than enough power with any of the gas engines currently available for it (2.7L EcoBoost, 5.0L V8, or the 3.5L EcoBoost). Of the four engines (3 gassers and 1 diesel), the 3.5L EcoBoost has the most power, and it has power to spare. The 3.5L EcoBoost comes in two configurations; regular and high output. The "regular" is more powerful than all the others except the high output version, and the high output version is nothing short of ridiculous.

-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost


Posted By: StephenH
Date Posted: 20 Jun 2019 at 2:59pm
Originally posted by GlueGuy

The newer generation F-150 does not need that diesel. You would have more than enough power with any of the gas engines currently available for it (2.7L EcoBoost, 5.0L V8, or the 3.5L EcoBoost). Of the four engines (3 gassers and 1 diesel), the 3.5L EcoBoost has the most power, and it has power to spare. The 3.5L EcoBoost comes in two configurations; regular and high output. The "regular" is more powerful than all the others except the high output version, and the high output version is nothing short of ridiculous.
Well, a guy can dream. Big smile You are correct though that I would probably opt for one of the two Ecoboost engines. I was really impressed with the 2L one in the Escape. The 3.5L one, even in the "regular" version is probably awesome.



-------------
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,...

http://www.rpod-owners.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=7712 - ouR escaPOD mods
Former RPod 179
Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS


Posted By: GlueGuy
Date Posted: 20 Jun 2019 at 3:33pm
Originally posted by StephenH

Originally posted by GlueGuy

The newer generation F-150 does not need that diesel. You would have more than enough power with any of the gas engines currently available for it (2.7L EcoBoost, 5.0L V8, or the 3.5L EcoBoost). Of the four engines (3 gassers and 1 diesel), the 3.5L EcoBoost has the most power, and it has power to spare. The 3.5L EcoBoost comes in two configurations; regular and high output. The "regular" is more powerful than all the others except the high output version, and the high output version is nothing short of ridiculous.
Well, a guy can dream. Big smile You are correct though that I would probably opt for one of the two Ecoboost engines. I was really impressed with the 2L one in the Escape. The 3.5L one, even in the "regular" version is probably awesome.
It is. I have a hard time believing it's a "V6" under the hood when I step on it. Smooth, quiet power in abundance. It will pull the R-pod in 6th gear at 65 MPH at roughly 1500 RPM without breaking a sweat. We have friends with the 2.7L EcoBoost and those trucks go quite well too. People like the V8 for the sound, but both of the EcoBoost engines put out as much (or more) torque at lower RPM.

-------------
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River
2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com