Would be kind of fun to mount on the hood of the TV, though.  You could always watch it later to see where you made the wrong turn and got lost.

As an aside, personally I wish that spoiler wasn't there, it's really the only place that our nice single sheet fiberglass roofs are compromised in a way that is conducive to leaking. I have a hard time believing that does much to reduce drag either. 

The trailer rear id light requirement could have been met with a much much smaller and easier to seal light bar.  More room for solar that way too. I'm sure I could find a more robust spare tire cover if that was the only problem. I  think that its likely driven FR's marketing folks, they probably just decided a spoiler would look "cool". Like lots of he spoilers you see on cars, they often increase drag. I bet they've never done any actual wind tunnel testing or cfd analysis to optimize the spoiler design 

I searched for it but nothing came up.  

Check out the link in the text that'll take you to several video simulations.  It says "on that channel" in blue.

If the airstream is going to become unstuck from the camper, which it inevitably will with the steep backs of our trailers, then the value of a spoiler is to try to get that airflow away from the trailer as much as possible as soon as possible. Hence the term 'spoiler". 

The video simulations seem to show that a spoiler won't do much to move the needle, the negative pressure gradient behind the trailer is just too big to overcome. That was what I suspected when I said I thought the FR spoiler was stuck on there more for looks than functionality. 

One thing that might help is something like these vortex generators which go aft on the sides of RV's, but boy are they ugly.

http://www.airtab.com/application-rv.htm

I can also see why you might get a little improvement with a spoiler placed aft on the wo vehicle to try to keep the airstream out of the space between the TV and the trailer. Like this:

http://www.purplelineusa.com/products-aeroplus.php

My solution is just to <60 and not worry about it.  

So does the wind suck or push a sailboat sailing on any point of sail other than dead down wind?

Everyone has different priorities.  If FR did everything people here said they should the Pod would cost more than an Airstream, weigh as much as a semi truck, and each trailer would have things added that would produce a many complaints as the current models do.  They are what they are.

Keith-N-Dar I agree that the rPod can't have all kinds of things added to it without costing too much. I'm not suggesting adding anything, quite the opposite. The difference here is that the spoiler costs FR money and doesn't appear to add any useful benefit, in fact it increases the risk of leaks. It appears to be purely someone's idea of what's aesthetically pleasing. It would be a win win to just leave it off. 

Actually in thinking about it more, it would probably be easier to manage potential leaks if it was removed because then I could directly see and seal the penetrations themselves. To deal with the lights I could just get a DOT approved trailer id light bar from Amazon for 10-15$ and attach it to the back frame of the rear solar module. 

Does anyone know what adhesive/sealant FR uses to attach the spoiler and if there is a way to remove it cleanly from the fiberglass? Mine is a 2015.