R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Warranty, Service and Recall Bulletins
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Water Leaks
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWater Leaks

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
TeeBrock View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2017
Location: IA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Water Leaks
    Posted: 12 Apr 2017 at 9:23pm
I tend to believe that stupid puts them on 😊
Back to Top
Richand Cindy View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2016
Location: New Jersey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Apr 2017 at 3:31pm
Forest River is a Warren Buffet Company and I am sure to reduce or avoid lawsuits he has his lawyers check for whatever warning stickers they can add.  Remember the days when styrofoam coffee cups did not warn about containing hot coffee, and dry cleaner plastic bags did not warn about suffocating if you put them on your head.  I am amazed nothing ever happend to me.  So glad I am now warned about everything Lamp
OLD 2017.5 RPOD 180 + 2015 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk
NEW: 2018 Passport Elite 23RB + 2017 Ram 1500 Diesel
Back to Top
jato View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Location: Kewadin, MI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3227
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Apr 2017 at 5:35pm
How did the human race exist this long w/o warning stickers?  Confused
God's pod
'11 model 177
'17 Ford F-150 4WD 3.5 Ecoboost
Jim and Diane by beautiful Torch Lake
"...and you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free."
Back to Top
StephenH View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2015
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6289
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Apr 2017 at 7:40pm
Unfortunately, what used to be common sense is no longer common but unusual. We have to put up with ridiculous warning labels for everything because many people are lawsuit crazy and don't want to take any personal responsibility for their actions. It is too easy to sue those with "deep pockets" and hope they will settle for a large amount rather than go to court and risk a jury give someone who should have known better a large judgment out of sympathy for the "little guy" because the corporation "can afford it."
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,...

ouR escaPOD mods
Former RPod 179
Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS
Back to Top
TeeBrock View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2017
Location: IA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Apr 2017 at 7:50pm
LOL
Mike, I love it !!!!
That is so true......lol
Tee
and Sadie (Chocolate Lab)
2017.5 RP 180
2006 Kia Sorento
2002 BMW R1150RS
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2587
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Apr 2017 at 9:47am
Before I retired I defended personal injury lawsuits, including warning label cases.  I made this comment in another post, but it is apropos here:  I recall an industrial safety study that suggested there is an inverse relationship between the number of warning stickers and the effectiveness of the warnings.  The more you flood people with silly warnings about the obvious, the less they pay attention to any, even the serious ones.

The reason there are so many stickers is that there are a bunch of corporate lawyers, who are irrationally frightened of any risk and overreact by demanding that a warning label be put on for every conceivable danger, even the obvious ones.  

Winning warning label cases is very hard.  Few jurors are sympathetic to the plaintiff and there are very few cases where the claimant actually wins.  Corporate lawyers want these cases settled because they don't want to get in trouble with the higher ups if the case "goes south."  They'll offer money even though the case is defensible just to eliminate the "risk exposure" and defense costs.  [No, defense lawyers don't work for free.]  It is not a problem with a pretty good legal system, but with "office" lawyers who are trying to cover their butts and keep off the corporate radar.  In the long run, we all pay for their timidity.
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
TeeBrock View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2017
Location: IA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Apr 2017 at 9:59am
I find myself thinking "How stupid do you have to be...." but then, I'm reminded of the fact that I, too, could have had 13 million dollars if only, I would have spilled coffee in my lap Thumbs Up
Tee
and Sadie (Chocolate Lab)
2017.5 RP 180
2006 Kia Sorento
2002 BMW R1150RS
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2587
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Apr 2017 at 10:31am
Tee, the case you are talking about is Liebeck v. McDonalds.  There is an incredible amount of mis-information about that case and it has become an urban legend of the so called "frivolous" lawsuit.  But like most urban legends, there is little that is based on fact.  

The Ms. Liebeck, who sustained 3d degree burns, didn't get $13M.  The judge reduced the verdict to $640K and it ultimately settled for less than $600K.  Wiki has a nice summary of the case:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants

Unfortunately, many use these truly out of the ordinary lawsuits to argue that the tort system is broken, and yes, every so often it doesn't work so well; but these cases are aberrations, not the norm.  What our tort system needs to work well are more courtrooms and judges to allow prompt trials and less chicken corporate attorneys and insurance executives who would rather settle than try cases because it's easier to pass the cost on to their customers.  The overwhelming majority of accident cases that are tried are "defensed" [i.e. won by the defendant].

People can file lawsuits for pretty much anything, but they don't go far in court.  I recall once defending a case brought by a distraught widow because she claimed that her recently interred husband was decomposing in his grave.  When I got the case, I practically fell out of my chair laughing.  The judge did too when he granted summary judgment.  

Like all things in life, the more we know and the deeper we dig into the details, the more we find out that things are not as simple as they may seem at first.
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz