|
ouR escaPOD mods |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 3031323334 58> |
| Author |
 Share Topic Printable Version Google Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks reddit Facebook MySpace Newsvine Furl Topic Search  Topic Options
|
|
lostagain 
Senior Member 
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2587 |
 Post Options
 Quote Reply
 Topic: ouR escaPOD modsPosted: 05 Jun 2019 at 5:50pm |
|
|
I can understand a Mystery Hill in NC being full of optical illusions, but not the Mystery Spot near Santa Cruz. There all the stuff is true.
|
||
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
||
 |
||
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6288 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Jun 2019 at 3:59pm |
|
|
It probably appears to be running uphill. It is like some of the "magnetic" roads where it looks like a car is being pulled uphill. It is an optical illusion though. Mystery Hill in Boone, NC is one such example. (see also Gravity Hills).
|
||
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
||
|
||
|
lostagain
Senior Member
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2587 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Jun 2019 at 3:43pm |
|
|
Waddaya mean water doesn't run up hill? At the Mystery Spot near Santa Cruz it does.
|
||
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
||
|
||
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6288 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Jun 2019 at 10:21am |
|
I don't think weep holes will be needed. The bottom of the axle tube has a curve but the steel angle does not have that curve so there is a space on the bottom of the angle. Given that the axle tube is highest in the center and slopes down toward the wheels and that water does not run uphill, any water that may get inside should naturally flow outward toward the wheels where it will be able to drip out through the space between the axle tube and the peak of the steel angle. Even though this picture is blurry, it should show what I am describing.
On a
|
||
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
||
|
||
|
offgrid
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Jun 2019 at 7:41am |
|
|
Drain holes kept small say 1/8 inch won't be significant structurally but there's not really a channel open under there to carry water to them, the angle is up against the axle. So I don't know that they'd do much good either.
Barring something strange like the angle sliding side ways or falling off don't expect anything definitive to come from one or two field uses. That's because the failure rate of our axles is fairly low to begin with. I like to exercise my brain so here are some numbers. Lets say there are 10,000 rpods on the road and they've been sold for 10 years (average age 5 years) so there are roughly 50,000 rPod-years of product history out there now. Let's say that there have been 1,000 axle failures in that time (just a wild guess on my part), so that's a 1000/50000 or a 2% per year failure rate with the existing axle, or a 20% failure rate over 10 years. These aren't the right numbers of course but they're probably not way off the mark either. Most folks don't experience axle failures, but a significant number do. What would success look like for an axle reinforcement? Lets say we want to cut that 2% down by a factor of 10 and get a 10X reliability improvement, for a 0.2% annual axle failure rate or 2% over 10 years. How many field trials would you need to run to prove that? The math used to do that kind of failure analysis is called the binomial distribution. If you run that calc for this case it turns out that if you want to be 80% confident that you've taken the failure rate down to 0.2% per rPod-year then you'd need to run about 800 trials (800 rPods for a year or 400 for 2 years for example) and have zero axle failures. So, to prove anything definitive from field testing we'd need to get about 10% of our 8000 members to do the mod, tow for a year, and report back that their axles were all still good. As we say in engineering, that ain't gonna happen.  So, we need to depend on the structural calculations instead. Those show a significant (about 50% increase) in load capacity of the axle tube from adding the reinforcement. It doesn't do anything to help with the potential to have bent torque arms, spindles, or crushed rubber cords though.
|
||
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
||
|
||
|
DavMar
Senior Member
Joined: 04 Aug 2017 Location: Lexington, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 592 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 10:37pm |
|
|
Maybe I’m naïve but if there is a worry about water collecting
in the bottom of the V channel of the angle iron why not drill a couple of small weep
holes in it? I don’t know if it would affect the strength of this steel brace but I don't believe it would. On a side note I'm looking very forward to reports on how this axle mod has worked out in real use over time. |
||
|
Dave & Marlene J with Zoey the
wonder dog. 2017 Rpod 180 2016 Toyota Tacoma SR5 4x4 Lexington, NC |
||
|
||
|
DavMar
Senior Member
Joined: 04 Aug 2017 Location: Lexington, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 592 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 10:36pm |
|
|
Maybe I’m naïve but if there is a worry about water collecting
in the bottom of the V chanel of the angle iron why not drill a couple of small weep
holes in it? I don’t know if it would affect the strength of this steel brace but I don't believe it would. On a side note I'm looking very forward to reports on how this axle mod has worked out in real use over time. |
||
|
Dave & Marlene J with Zoey the
wonder dog. 2017 Rpod 180 2016 Toyota Tacoma SR5 4x4 Lexington, NC |
||
|
||
|
offgrid
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 6:35pm |
|
|
I'll be looking out for that as well but I don't think it will, its not like the axle is moving around, and the friction from the ubolts is really high. Unforlunately, it will be another month before I (hopefully) get to take a trip of any distance in our rPod.
|
||
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
||
|
||
|
StephenH
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 29 Nov 2015 Location: Wake Forest, NC Online Status: Offline Posts: 6288 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 4:52pm |
|
|
Our first test will be soon when we go to Florida to see my parents. I'll be keeping a close watch on it to make sure the U bolts stay tight and the reinforcing angle does not shift.
|
||
|
StephenH
Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,... ouR escaPOD mods Former RPod 179 Current Cherokee Grey Wolf 24 JS |
||
|
||
|
offgrid
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Jul 2018 Online Status: Offline Posts: 5290 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Jun 2019 at 5:24am |
|
I was thinking about doing that but decided against it and just gave both the axle and the angle a good coating of rustoleum before mating them up. Either way, I'm sure my setup will rust faster than yours because of the salt environment here on the OBX. I had to grind and refinish my A frame this spring already due to corrosion there. We'll see what happens.
|
||
|
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft 2015 Rpod 179 - sold |
||
|
||
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 3031323334 58> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
