R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Podmods, Maintenance, Tips and Tricks
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Just completed 4,000 miles...avg of 10mpg
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedJust completed 4,000 miles...avg of 10mpg

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
jato View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Location: Kewadin, MI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3227
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Just completed 4,000 miles...avg of 10mpg
    Posted: 22 Aug 2019 at 11:49am
Have just finished an 1100 mile trip from the thumb of MI to the UP (Escanaba) and back home.  Thumb of MI speed 68 mph  11 mpg.  UP, of Michigan and return: speeds from 55 to 67 mph  12 mpg.
God's pod
'11 model 177
'17 Ford F-150 4WD 3.5 Ecoboost
Jim and Diane by beautiful Torch Lake
"...and you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free."
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2019 at 9:11am
To put it in perspective, if you get 14 mpg at 60 mph in dead flat no wind conditions like I do, you should get 12.8 mpg at 65 mph, and pretty much the same 12.8 mph at 60 into a 5 mph headwind. That's how significant the drag effect is. 

Around here on the freeway, you're a road boulder whether you drive at 60, 65 or 70 anyway, so for that economy difference, I'll travel at 60 and they can go around me LOL


1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
crankster78 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 08 May 2018
Location: Minn
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 163
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2019 at 8:59am
Greetings:
I've owned two pods, a 171 and now a 2015 179. I tow with a 2007 F-150 with the 4.6 V8, 8 foot box.  I get from 10 to 12.5 MPG towing at 60.  I usually drive on 2 lane roadways but do use freeways.  I stay in the right lane and let everyone go by.  I've had few problems with traffic.  Many trucks are driving at 65 or less.  I went to 8 ply tires which I run at 65 PSI.  They seem to improve mileage a bit.

Crankster78  
Crankster 78 R-179 2015
Back to Top
Motor7 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2019
Location: E. TN
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 196
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2019 at 8:44am
I wish I could tow at 60, but going that much slower than the rest of the traffic makes me uncomfortable. Even at 65 in a 70 means most of the other traffic is going 75 and 10 under has an impact on the other traffic as they try and get around me. It's my motorcycle background that makes me want to be travelling slightly faster than the average traffic speed where I feel the safest along with other threat detection and lane placement. I'm not knocking you guys that can go a bit slower at all, but I just can't do it. 

I appreciate all the info from everyone and at least I know 10mpg is about right for my set-up and speed. Maybe a different TV is in our future, but for now it will have to do. I do like the Avalanche platform. It was innovative back in it's day and it's too bad they discontinued it in 2014. 


2016 R-Pod 176T
Back to Top
mjlrpod View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1214
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2019 at 7:59am
I tracked my MPG on the ride home from Niagra Falls a few weeks ago pulling the 195. I tow with a 2015 Nissan Frontier with a 4.0 L V6.  I drove about 9 1/2 hours straight thru. Every time I stopped for gas,  I recorded my mileage and how many gallons to fill up. I got a good spectrum of road conditions, uphill, downhill, a good rain storm for awhile, then warm and sunny. At times I drove into a head wind, other times a tail wind.  I found I averaged 12 MPG. 
2017.5 Rp-172
2020 R-pod 195
2015 Frontier sv 4.0L 6cyl
I'll be rpodding
Back to Top
Olddawgsrule View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 20 Sep 2017
Location: New Hampshire
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1014
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2019 at 7:13am
I tow with my Tacoma. I see a reduction in mileage of a 35% average when towing. Your mileage numbers it within what I see on mine. 

Know, I drive tops just under 65mph. I'm the last one up the hill, typically. Cruise control only on the flats. I've been cross-country twice now (Canada and USA), so I've driven most all conditions.
Byways no Highways
2017 Tacoma
Truck Camper Build
2004 F150 My Overlander
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Aug 2019 at 2:20am
Originally posted by podwerkz

Originally posted by furpod


 he found that the "spoiler" actually increased drag.. LOL 
 
 

That's what rear spoilers do...they add drag to produce downforce.



That's what a wing is supposed to do. On a race car a wing creates negative lift at the expense of drag to increase downforce. Basically its an airplane wing flipped upside down.  

A spoiler on a passenger vehicle is usually supposed to reduce drag. It does this by "spoiling" the airflow over a surface, changing the aerodynamics. Rear spoilers if done right reduce the steep downward angle the airflow sees from the rear roof edge, delaying airflow separation. The same thing that trailer tails on trucks are intended to do.  The problem is that much of the time on passenger vehicles they don't provide any benefit other than (maybe) looking cool. 

I'm not sure if the spoiler on the back of an rPod falls into this purely aesthetic category or not. Sounds like from furpod's post the answer is yes. It would be interesting to try to do a coast down test with and without it and see for sure. It you find a few miles of flat empty road on a windless day, accelerate to about 65 mph, put the vehicle in neutral, and then film the speedo with your smartphone while you coast down to a few mph, you can put the speed and time numbers in a spreadsheet which will calculate your drag and rolling resistance. Best to do several runs both directions and average them. I did it with my car once and it was reasonably accurate but I haven't tried it with my tow rig yet.
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
podwerkz View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2019
Location: Texas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 966
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2019 at 11:20pm
Originally posted by furpod


 he found that the "spoiler" actually increased drag.. LOL
 
 

That's what rear spoilers do...they add drag to produce downforce.

Just FYI, I typically get between 10 and 14mpg  with mine, depending on wind, hills, and my right foot.

The difference is, with my 390hp V8, and 7 speed slushbox, the go pedal works quite well when I need it to, even when climbing hills.


r・pod 171 gone but not forgotten!
Back to Top
marwayne View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Location: Edmonton AB Can
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1002
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2019 at 10:20pm
Just came back from a 1550 mile trip, 75 % mountain driving, 2016 Tundra, average speed 60 mph, 12.25 mpg.
If you want something done right, do it yourself.
2011 RP172, 2016 Tundra 5.7 Litre, Ltd.


Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Aug 2019 at 7:57pm
First a caveat when comparing fuel economy figures. It is very difficult to get an accurate and consistent fuel economy number because very slight changes in wind speed and direction can make a tremendous difference. That is because about 2/3 of the horsepower required towing at 60 is used to overcome drag. Drag goes up with the square of the wind speed and horsepower goes up with the cube of wind speed. Climbing and descending hills makes a big difference as well. Going up and down hills will kill you because you never get all the energy you put in going up when you go back down.

That being said, dead flat, 60 mph, no wind, I get just at 14 mpg towing my 179 with my Highlander. And thats not because the Highlander is a lighter vehicle, the difference in rolling resistance due to that is not very significant and the most of the power goes to overcome drag anyway.

I suspect you are right and are slitting at an unfortunate point on your engines horsepower curve at 65 mph in 4th gear which forces a downshift to 3rd. The additional pumping losses your engine is incurring at the higher rpm are eating into your fuel economy. Try slowing down to 60 or till wherever the truck stays in 4th gear. Pick a no wind day and a flat road, and get your fuel economy number again, see if it goes up to something closer to Glueguy’s and mine. If it does then that was the problem, if not then there might be something else going on with your drivetrain.

1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz