R-pod Owners Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Non-pod Discussion Forums > Mods, Maintenance, Tips and Tricks
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Towing MPG
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Towing MPG

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
Leo B View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Location: Lyndonville, Vt
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3856
Post Options Post Options   Quote Leo B Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Towing MPG
    Posted: 29 Dec 2017 at 4:23pm
I find that doing 55-60 on the interstate gets us our best mileage, though it does aggravate a few down south where the speed limit is 70, but oh well we're retired Big smile
Also agree with proper tire pressure and daft of the truckers whenever possible.
Leo and Melissa
2015 R-pod 179 prev 2010 171
2017 Ford F-150 Super Cab 5.0
2013 Dodge Grand Caravan
2010 Harley Davidson Electra Glide Classic

Back to Top
Outbound View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 764
Post Options Post Options   Quote Outbound Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 7:25pm
Long ago, I ran an airflow simulator on my r-pod.  The video below tells it all - a huge low-pressure vortex forms behind the trailer.  I made a few other videos on that channel with spoilers in various places - nothing really has a significant impact.

My best advice after nine years of 'podding: 55mph is the sweet spot for gas mileage.




Craig :: 2009 RP171 towed by a 2017 F150
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Dayton NV
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 233
Post Options Post Options   Quote lostagain Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Dec 2017 at 9:58am
Out, some very interesting videos.  What speed was programed into the simulations?  What is difference in the air pressure for the different colors?  Looks like the camper shell/topper helps quite a bit with turbulence between the TV and the Pod.  

I think your advice of driving around 55 is not only best for mileage, it's also best for the TV, and the driver's state of being.  
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Our Pod 172
2004 Dodge Dakota 4x4 v8
Back to Top
ronahue View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Location: Massachusetts
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 233
Post Options Post Options   Quote ronahue Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Dec 2017 at 10:49am
The problem is that the test was done with Canadian air, hey. President Trump has assured us that U.S. air flows much better in fact we have the best flowing air in the world. In fact he is planning to build a wall to keep Canadian air outWink
Ron & Sharon
2015 R-Pod 179
2015 Nissan Frontier

No trees were harmed in the sending of this message but a billion electrons were really agitated
Back to Top
Live2Camp View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2017
Location: No. California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 83
Post Options Post Options   Quote Live2Camp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Dec 2017 at 11:41am
Originally posted by lostagain

I think your advice of driving around 55 is not only best for mileage, it's also best for the TV, and the driver's state of being.  

Agree! And in California (at least), driving 55 while towing keeps money in your pocket that you would otherwise spend on a speeding ticket Smile
Live2Camp & tell about it
Still love rugged, diggin' comfy too
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River (the green one)
His: Ford F150 double cab 4WD Ecoboost; Hers (mine): Toyota Tacoma 4WD double cab
Back to Top
Larry-D View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 12 Oct 2017
Location: Middle TN
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
Post Options Post Options   Quote Larry-D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Dec 2017 at 2:37pm
The spoiler on our 172 makes it go faster.


Back to Top
mcarter View Drop Down
podders Helping podders - pHp
podders Helping podders - pHp
Avatar

Joined: 07 Apr 2016
Location: Greenbrier, TN
Online Status: Online
Posts: 1157
Post Options Post Options   Quote mcarter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Dec 2017 at 4:15pm
+1 Larry, sometimes I feel the TT pushing the TV.
Mike Carter
2015 178
2016 Chevy Colorado
2006 Chevy Silverado K1500
1 English Bulldog
Back to Top
ToolmanJohn View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Apr 2014
Location: Connecticut
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 408
Post Options Post Options   Quote ToolmanJohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 7:35am
 I have come to my own personal conclusion over the few years I've been towing. If you are towing many thousands of miles per year, buy a great tow vehicle first. If you buy overkill, you will still get decent (for towing) fuel economy. It's better than using a vehicle that usually gets 25 mpg highway which plummets to 11-12mpg towing.

 If towing is NOT thousands of miles a year. Then just ignore the fuel use and cost. Use the tow vehicle you have now, and enjoy camping. No need to agonize over fuel use if it's a low percentage of your overall yearly mileage.

 You could use a lot of math (rate calculations) to justify a new tow vehicle, but you will have to get the right combination of vehicle cost and fuel economy as it relates to your towing miles. Also, do you tow mountains, flat lands, tow weight, etc. So many variables.

 It is difficult (and usually expensive) to achieve small AND measurable improvements in fuel economy. 
2017 ATC 7X20 Custom Toy Hauler
2013 R-Pod 177 (SOLD)
2013 VW Touareg TDI
Back to Top
PilotPodder View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 04 May 2016
Location: Portage, MI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 94
Post Options Post Options   Quote PilotPodder Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Jan 2018 at 6:48pm
Happy to announce on this past weekend's long trip south, I pushed 12 MPG with the Tundra and the 179. Less than 11 in Mich/Ind/Ohio, but lots of headwind. Better in KY and TN (mid-11s) even in the mountains. Actually better than expected (> 12) the farther south we went. Mind you, I was at 60 mph or less 95% of the time. Altogether, I'm pleased. I guess it is all relative. The Tundra never won any contest on fuel efficiency! 
Romans 8:38-39
Portage, MI — 2017 RPod 179 / 2017 Toyota Tundra — My RPod YouTube Videos
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz