Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Leo B
podders Helping podders - pHp
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Location: Lyndonville, VT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4518
|
Topic: Decisions - decisions - decisions Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 2:10pm |
We have a 179 and love it. Lots of storage and room to move. We tow with a Dodge Grand Caravan up and down the east coast. We average 13.5 per gallon in Vermont
and 15-17 once we get below Massachusetts ( depending on wind).
|
Leo & Melissa Bachand
2017 Ford F150
2021 Vista Cruiser 19 csk
Previously owned
2015 Rpod 179
2010 Rpod 171
|
 |
furpod
Moderator Group - pHp
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Location: Central KY
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6128
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 12:39pm |
I get crappy mileage all the time.. But I don't fear overdrive or mountains.. LOL.
I love the construction, materials, and vibe of the T@B's.. BUT.. I am a full sized human, almost always have my sweetie with me, and a couple larger dogs.. But even without them, I think a T@B would get pretty small if you have a couple rainy days..
|
 |
hogone
Senior Member
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Location: St. Louis
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1060
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 12:23pm |
I never drive in OD when towing. hogone
|
Jon & Pam
2013 RP177
2010 F150
2017 HD Streetglide
2009 HD Lowrider
CHEESEHEAD
|
 |
ParPod
Senior Member
Joined: 28 Oct 2016
Location: Manitoba
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 105
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 11:21am |
BogieMeister - great points made by both CharlieM and jato - between the two units - I'd go 179 but then again like most on this forum I'm biased! Good Luck with your choice
|
Bob&Margaret
2017 179
2016 Toyota 4Runner
2 sets of Golf Clubs
|
 |
jato
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Location: Kewadin, MI
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3331
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 11:15am |
Great point Charlie. We have towed our 177 with both an '08 and '13 Explorer and rarely put it in OD for the reasons stated above. Most anyone towing a pod get from 11-14 mpg overall when you factor in mountains, city, country driving. That being said, even though I am a small guy compared to you (5'11") I get a bit claustrophobic in the T&B, kinda tight and not very tall inside. You will experience a significant difference in room between the two.
|
God's pod
'11 model 177
'17 Ford F-150 4WD 3.5 Ecoboost
Jim and Diane by beautiful Torch Lake
"...and you will know the Truth and the Truth will set you free."
|
 |
CharlieM
Senior Member
Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Location: N. Colorado
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1797
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 10:50am |
First, any Pod will lower you gas mileage more than the T@B. It's a simple function of frontal cross sectional area. Wind resistance has more effect than weight unless you climbing steep hills.
Second, dropping into a non OD gear is good for the engine and transmission. The engine is able to operate in its design range and the transmission is locked in a gear. I monitor transmission temperature and have experimented with OD and non OD running on flat stretches. Engaging the OD causes an immediate and marked rise in transmission temperature without a noticeable increase in MPG. Heat is bad news for the transmission.
|
Charlie
Northern Colorado
OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD
PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD
|
 |
BogieMeister
Newbie
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Location: Montgomery, TX
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 10:27am |
My real concern is the wear and tear on the TV if I have to drive in fourth gear all the time. Do you use your OD?
The reason I am leaning toward the 179 as opposed to the 178 is because on the 178 I see no obvious place to store clothing and toiletries.
|
 |
ArenaBlanca
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Sep 2016
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 158
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 10:12am |
My experience with other campers is that the drag effects the gas mileage more than the weight. That said, you are going to experience reduced mileage with either RV. I'd go with the 179. I did!
|
 |
BogieMeister
Newbie
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Location: Montgomery, TX
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6
|
Posted: 17 Feb 2017 at 9:57am |
Currently I am in the decision mode. I'm torn between the r-pod 179 and the T@B. This will be my first RV, and I really don't want to have to replace it because I made a bad choice. I'm an old, big, guy( 6'1" 235 lbs) My tow vehicle will be a 2016 Honda Pilot
AWD (tow capacity 5000 lbs) The transmission is a six speed, which drops to a four speed if you take it out of over-drive. Which about doubles the rpm at 55 mph. I will be traveling mostly by myself, but occasionally by sweetie will join me. We live in Texas, which is relatively flat-ish.
So, here's my question. With the miniature T@B (1670 lbs) I will be able to drive in overdrive, but will be living in cramped quarters. From the articles seen on this forum I assume that with the r-pod I will not be able to use overdrive. I believe this will over-tax the drive train and ruin my gas mileage.
What are your thoughts?
|
 |