R-pod Owners Forum Homepage

This site is free to use.
Donations benefit a non-profit Girls Softball organization

Forum Home Forum Home > R-pod Discussion Forums > Podmods, Maintenance, Tips and Tricks
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Have you weighed your 180?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHave you weighed your 180?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2595
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Have you weighed your 180?
    Posted: 28 May 2020 at 3:04pm
I have no intention of coming out of my very enjoyable retirement.  Now I can rant and rave about other stuff, though I can't "talk" about it here.  

And, I was almost never on the side that was arguing to pin responsibility on someone else.  I was one of those dang insurance lawyers who always said "NO" not a dime in tribute and my client is not responsible for its failures; you are as an unformed consumer.  Caveat emptor.   Like the sporting ladies of the night, I was paid by the hour, just like expert witnesses.  

This is what you call thread drift.  Star 
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 2:55pm
I figured you had to be a pilot to use the terminology. It is indeed the same basic issue. You even have a weight vs cg envelope you have to stay within, just like with an aircraft. I agree with you regarding knowing where you are with this stuff, it would be hard for us to take the position on the witness stand  that we didn't understand the engineering so we used the zen approach. A smart lawyer like lostagain would eat us for lunch, 'cept that he would be going after the deep pockets of FR. Berkshire, and Mr. Buffett, not us poor rPodders. Cry
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
Colt View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2019
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 12:58pm
I am also both a (inactive) pilot and an engineer, thus the reason for asking about Weight and Balance. There are similarities enough and stability is the issue in both cases. Divergent oscillations being the result, and I don't want any! Having been named personally in a suit over an environmental disaster, I am motivated to at least put out the effort do do a calc to see that I'm safe, errors notwithstanding.
John
'16 R-Pod 180
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 12:38pm
Maybe we should emerge from retirement and seek out plaintiffs who have gone off the road from not having their trailer loading right. You can litigate and I'll be your expert witness. I only want $500 per hourBig smile

Nope, actually light aircraft W&B is only done in one longitudinal dimension. Same as for a trailer. And there are only typically 4 "stations" that change: front seat pax, rear seat pax, luggage, and fuel.  With a trailer there are a whole lot more things that move around, not counting the mods ppl do (if those get done on an aircraft an A&P mechanic has to do them and sign off on them and recalc the W&B). So really light airplanes are relatively simple.

But I think you've hit the proverbial nail on the head. Most of the time, the zen approach to trailer w&b works just fine, and ppl don't die. Lots of pilots use the zen approach too, but the difference is that generally you don't die if you mess up your trailer W&B. It has happened though, no doubt. So it will come back to what is reasonable and customary in the industry, right? If you screw up your zen in the trailer that's on you at this point, there is no case law putting it on the manufacturer (until you get your specialized practice going and call me as a witness anyway). 

If you screw it up in your airplane, that's on you too, unless Cessna screwed it up, and they didn't, and besides, you were trained, and Cessna knows you were trained. If FR published a w&b worksheet and screwed it up, or didn't make sure you knew how to use it, they have now changed what is reasonable and customary in the industry, right? Not to mention creating a reason for ppl to be afraid to buy trailers....Not in their best interest.....

1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2595
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 11:43am
I fully agree, I am not an engineer.  Plus my belief in magic, perpetual motion, and anti-gravity devices automatically disqualifies me.  

As for W&B, a trailer's balance is not likely to be as complex as an aircraft, but I could be wrong.  The Zen of W&B has worked quite nicely for me and our TT.

The failure to give adequate product use instructions, such as how to balance your trailer, is more fertile ground for product liability suits than would be a simple chart to figure out where the heavy stuff should go..  You are mixing the complexity of aeronautical physics with a simple travel trailer that usually only moves in 2 dimensions and is generally connected to the ground.  Why make things needlessly complex?  The Zen of trailer balance works just dandy, until it doesn't.
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 11:28am
lostagain, don't try to practice engineering. You're a great lawyer but an engineer, not. 

Like most non-engineers, you are underestimating what would be required to do the job of properly releasing a W&B worksheet in a way that doesn't put the company at risk. The FAA's handbook for aeronautical engineers on W&B is 114 pages. The airman's knowledge handbook that all pilots are trained and tested on has a half dozen pages on the topic, and in pilot training you spend a whole 2 hour session on it usually. A typical POH (pilot's operating handbook) for a small aircraft devotes 10-12 pages to the topic. Trailers would likely be more complicated, because the loading scenarios for a trailer are a lot more complicated than for a small airplane. The safe operating envelopes are a lot more complex too, because there is a second vehicle involved. 

So, you can call a trailer manufacturing company not wanting to incur all that cost "cheap" but why would it when no one expects it to do so? If the company just provided anyone who asked their engineering W&B worksheet, without all the training and accompanying documentation, change control procedures whenever the design of each trailer changed, etc, someone would misuse the tool, a death or injury would occur, and the company would be subject to a lawsuit. 

Is a lawsuit justified in that case? I think almost certainly yes, because surely the company has a duty to try to assure that the parties that it gave access to the tool were capable of using it properly. That's relatively easy when its a trained in-house engineer who has a supervisor and there are review and test procedures for every new trailer design. Not so for the general public. Its more like giving a chain saw to a 10 year old, pointing him at a tree and saying have at it. But that's just my observation, now we are in your area of expertise, not mine, so I will be interested in your thoughts on that. 

 
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2595
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 10:18am
OG, don't try to practice law.  You're a great engineer, but a lawyer not.

There is no reason not to give a W&B work sheet, except cost.  It has nothing to do with legal liability or lawyers.  
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 10:08am
And I have more experience in product engineering (which is what a W&B spreadsheet is after all), since 1978. All companies are "cheap", probably none spend what the really should on either engineering or legal resources. Call the motivation "fear of litigation" or "wanting to do the right thing", companies have to decide where to apply their limited resources and where not to. 

Going back to Colt's original comment, my point is that just because the FR engineers have a W&B spreadsheet that they use when designing their trailers doesn't mean that that can be provided for external use by customers without a substantial outlay of additional engineering and legal resources. And to what end? A W&B sheet is not either expected by trailer customers or customary in the RV industry. Better not to do it at all, as I'm quite certain both their head of engineering and their chief counsel would advise. 
1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
lostagain View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2595
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 9:21am
I think I've had a little more experience in practicing law (since 1973).  If companies don't want to pay lawyers to review, and often translate from engineerese to legalese (two incomprehensible languages for normal humans) then they're cheap.  It's not because of fear of suits.  


Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney
Sonoma 167RB
Our Pod 172
2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost
Back to Top
offgrid View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 Jul 2018
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5290
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 2020 at 8:59am
Originally posted by lostagain

It would be easier to make a legal case against FR for the failure to provide a weight and balance sheet than to make one against them for someone who didn't follow the instructions using one.  It's isn't that hard to write adequate disclaimers on a weight and balance sheet.  A job for a first year law student.

Just like their use of a generic "owners manual" for most of their trailer lines, it's really a matter on not wanting to incur the cost of writing trailer specific materials.  

I knew I'd get a response on that one.Tongue

It doesn't work the way you suggest in practice, or maybe in a way it does. In manufacturing companies I've worked for there are always staff engineers who could easily write the instructions so that was budgeted, but not staff attorneys who could vet them and write the disclaimers. That would have cost additional unbudgeted $$. So documents requiring legal review and input never happened unless they were essential for sales of the products.  And specific materials were always discouraged due to the risk that they would not be maintained properly and result negligence claims.

In aviation, W&B worksheets are essential to keep the pilot and their passengers alive, so they are done as a matter of course. The customers are pilots who have been trained in the use of these materials and tested and licensed by the FAA certifying that they know how to do so. Not so with RV owners, the vast majority of whom wouldn't have the faintest idea what a W&B sheet was for. 

1994 Chinook Concourse
1995 RV6A Experimental Aircraft
2015 Rpod 179 - sold
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.64
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz