![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 12> |
Author | |
CharlieM ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Nov 2012 Location: N. Colorado Online Status: Offline Posts: 1797 |
![]() Posted: 24 Jun 2018 at 2:44pm |
OK. One more input. No dog in this fight but I do have the experience of towing a similar trailer (RP172) with a 3.5L V6. The 2015 Outback was offered with a 2.5L 4cyl and 3.6L 6cyl. My guess is the structure of the basic vehicle including frame and brakes was the same. Towing capacity of the 6cyl model is 2700-3000 pounds. Therefore I think safety of the 4cyl model is not an issue. The remaining issues are performance and vehicle life. Performance of the 4cyl will extremely marginal. Hills and mountains will be very slow but you're prepared for that it may be OK. Air resistance increases as the square of speed so maintaining 60 MPH may be difficult. You might find yourself hunched over the steering wheel shouting "Go, go" but that might be acceptable. The last issue is vehicle stress and its impact on vehicle life. Pulling a full sized trailer with high frontal area will stress the little engine and drive train. This will be the real difference from the popup experience. According to other forums towing with a CVT may be iffy. So if you don't mind reducing the life/reliability of the vehicle this also may be acceptable. Towing my 172 with a Honda V6 was OK on level ground at sea level but it was on the edge on mountain grades. I accepted it but wouldn't want any less engine. Consider these comments in your decision. Either way you'll be safe but you may not be the first one to the campground.
![]() |
|
Charlie
Northern Colorado OLD: 2013 RP-172, 2010 Honda Pilot 3.5L 4WD PRESENT: 2014 Camplite 21RBS, 2013 Supercharged Tacoma 4L V6 4WD |
|
![]() |
|
lostagain ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Location: Quaker Hill, CT Online Status: Offline Posts: 2595 |
![]() |
Seems to me the horse is dead. So I, for one, am not going to beat it any more; at least not until its morale improves.
|
|
Never leave footprints behind.
Fred & Maria Kearney Sonoma 167RB Our Pod 172 2019 Ford F-150 4x4 2.7 EcoBoost |
|
![]() |
|
TrailerTrish ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 11 Jun 2018 Location: SF Bay Area Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
![]() |
Ok, fair ‘nuff. :) things to think about. Re durability, I have great faith in the Outback engine – perhaps too much – but my step-daughter just traded in her 22-year-old Outback with over 250,000 miles on it. And she wasn’t someone who took especially good care of things, used it for farm work, hauling hay and feed, things where she didn’t want to take the F250 out. Ours is now three years old and has about 20,000 miles on it. We are in our 70s, we tend to keep our speed down when we tow and are in no hurry when we travel - and we don’t mind being late to the campground! (grin) I have every faith (again, perhaps misplaced) that it will outlast us. Thanks so much for your thoughts and experiences. (Nice loco in your profile - my husband is a railfan) |
|
![]() |
|
TrailerTrish ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 11 Jun 2018 Location: SF Bay Area Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
![]() |
Please take this in a positive spirit; my experience is that members of this forum are eager to help and would be cheering you on if we thought otherwise. Your other questions about weight, structural integrity and such - really can't offer any help on that, without knowing the older 173s. I do alot of furniture and cabinet-building though and while what you are suggesting would make some difference, you might only be talking about maybe 100 lbs or so difference at the most, unless you go really high end like honeycomb plywood, but cost would be considerable. All I have to offer - if it were my rig, I wouldn't do it, but only you can decide. Thanks, Ben, I’ve appreciated your insights. I’ll keep the 70% in mind. And about the furniture, I guess I thought it would be a lot heavier. I based that assumption on the bloody dining table we took out of our A-frame and replaced with a slab of plywood. That table cracked my rib! I was trying to switch it from bed to table, and the leg was hung up, so I picked it up, bent back and rested it on my sternum on edge for a second to adjust my grip and Crack! Three months of misery, a rib belt, absolutely agonizing. So I assumed everything was made out of that stuff. |
|
![]() |
|
TrailerTrish ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 11 Jun 2018 Location: SF Bay Area Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
![]() |
Please take this in a positive spirit; my experience is that members of this forum are eager to help and would be cheering you on if we thought otherwise. Your other questions about weight, structural integrity and such - really can't offer any help on that, without knowing the older 173s. I do alot of furniture and cabinet-building though and while what you are suggesting would make some difference, you might only be talking about maybe 100 lbs or so difference at the most, unless you go really high end like honeycomb plywood, but cost would be considerable. All I have to offer - if it were my rig, I wouldn't do it, but only you can decide. Thanks, Ben, I’ve appreciated your insights. I’ll keep the 70% in mind. And about the furniture, I guess I thought it would be a lot heavier. I based that assumption on the bloody dining table we took out of our A-frame and replaced with a slab of plywood. That table cracked my rib! I was trying to switch it from bed to table, and the leg was hung up, so I picked it up, bent back and rested it on my sternum on edge for a second to adjust my grip and Crack! Three months of misery, a rib belt, absolutely agonizing. So I assumed everything was made out of that stuff. |
|
![]() |
|
GlueGuy ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 May 2017 Location: N. California Online Status: Offline Posts: 2707 |
![]() |
|
|
bp
2017 R-Pod 179 Hood River 2015 Ford F150 SuperCrew 4WD 3.5L Ecoboost |
|
![]() |
|
TrailerTrish ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 11 Jun 2018 Location: SF Bay Area Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
![]() |
Yeah, it always comes back to the wind issue. Sigh. It’s a biggie. I got an answer to my UK-small-car-towing-big-trailers question from a friend. He doesn’t tow a trailer, but he knows a lot about cars and their characteristics in general and is a freelance writer for automotive publications (gets to drive lots of different cars for reviews). He was explaining the torque in TDI engines, which is what they seem to test in the UK caravanning reviews. And while he thought UK drivers tend to be a lot safer than US drivers – his opinion – he said that his concern still was about the tail wagging the dog.
Maybe I could talk my husband into buying a Golf TDI for our TV. Hahaha. (I’m kidding!) |
|
![]() |
|
Ben Herman ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 26 Apr 2018 Location: Gr Junction, CO Online Status: Offline Posts: 356 |
![]() |
That makes sense - I drive a VW TDI wagon (think dieselgate) and it has way more torque than our big V6 Ridgeline - the diesel eats hills for breakfast. My towing vehicle of choice would be a VW Routan Diesel if I could ever find one.
|
|
![]() |
|
furpod ![]() Moderator Group - pHp ![]() ![]() Joined: 25 Jul 2011 Location: Central KY Online Status: Offline Posts: 6128 |
![]() |
True story... A few years ago we were camping at our 1000 Trails home park, Diamond Caverns in KY. In the park was a young Canadian couple, doing a 10,000 mile trip around the USA. They were on their way home. Can-Am RV in Canada had set up their TDi Jetta sedan, to tow.. a 25 foot Airstream. I love VW, but.. I wouldn't do that. LOL
|
|
![]() |
|
Ben Herman ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 26 Apr 2018 Location: Gr Junction, CO Online Status: Offline Posts: 356 |
![]() |
Yikes........
![]() |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |